From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ELKp7-0003gJ-5K for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:21:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8UDD02T006614; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:13:00 GMT Received: from smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8UDBKtV015124 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:11:20 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j8UDJuOh028661 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:19:57 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:17:15 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 arch team leads From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <433D313D.6050501@gentoo.org> References: <433A123A.9080706@gentoo.org> <433D313D.6050501@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-zpPqV9r2fAK0qfnFoC08" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:17:14 -0400 Message-Id: <1128086235.14224.33.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Archives-Salt: 3d416d8c-feda-4ec2-a111-670e3f8f42f9 X-Archives-Hash: 954a159cebc42c0e8f9de8d56d826886 --=-zpPqV9r2fAK0qfnFoC08 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 07:36 -0500, Mike Doty wrote: > | Well, the x86 team has now chosen some leads so we can start getting > | everything together as a team. For our leads, we have chosen to have a > | "committee" of 4 of us: halcy0n, solar, azarah, and wolf32o2. We each > | felt that we didn't have the time or experience to be able to handle > | being a sole lead by ourselves. > | > | Just letting everyone know what is going on with the team. > | > | Mark > Can you be a bit more specific? Do each of you lead a particular part > of the team, or do you all lead in general. Also, who is the head(what > would be refered to as strategic lead)? We can't be much more specific because we haven't defined any roles. Essentially, we're all working collaboratively to lead the group, and are on a massive recruitment drive from within the dev ranks. If you want a point of contact, you can contact me. I'm sure we'll fragment off a bit into more specialized roles as we figure out what is going on a bit better. Basically, none of us have the time to dedicate solely to running the x86 team, as we all have other projects which already takes up a lot of our time. There is no "head" per se, but as I said, you can contact me if you need anything. We pretty much feel that the arch team doesn't need a "lead" so much, as there isn't really a "direction" to go in, as an arch team is all QA/security/stabilization/releng. There's not much "strategic" about adding a keyword to packages and doing testing. The goal for us right now is to bring in some AT and pull in a lot more developers as full arch devs, so we can fully meet the expectations of an arch team. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-zpPqV9r2fAK0qfnFoC08 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDPTrakT4lNIS36YERAha6AJwJrTQJXhXz0LqvxQ/xuj/8s3tuKQCfU4oo eK3uSoTFsGzsV/lZSKO9GUo= =iJC4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-zpPqV9r2fAK0qfnFoC08-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list