From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EIRJR-0003TJ-1Z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:40:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8MDWlKo010622; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:32:47 GMT Received: from smtp03.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8MDTviQ010683 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:29:57 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp03.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j8MDa7t1028671 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:36:08 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:34:45 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] "Commercial" software in portage From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <433267CB.6020506@gentoo.org> References: <1127310677.30787.28.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050922003142.015c0529@sven.genone.homeip.net> <433267CB.6020506@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-uWmsKGSUVou/YfMBZICZ" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:34:44 -0400 Message-Id: <1127396085.24269.33.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Archives-Salt: c756bfe2-5a52-48d5-acba-9c1691aa1f0d X-Archives-Hash: 9af532053fcffffc96fb0d84e9bda0ad --=-uWmsKGSUVou/YfMBZICZ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 10:14 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Marius Mauch wrote: >=20 > > My other concern is that > > there is no clear criteria for commercial packages, e.g. are sun-jdk / > > other fetch restricted packages commercial? >=20 > +1 > I think the world isn't black and white and we might find things in the > grey area between "commercial" and "non-commercial". Not in this case. I'm not trying to make judgements based on the license. I am saying "You need to pay for this." If you don't have to hand over money, I'm not adding "commercial" to it. Doing any kind of interpretation of the licenses is GLEP23's territory, not mine. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-uWmsKGSUVou/YfMBZICZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDMrL0kT4lNIS36YERAj/xAJ9Fzm7EaO0Gr5GJP2rYUqsgsazfcwCgiFur 0jhLx8Z8a+ulfz5qGd2UadI= =TpYo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-uWmsKGSUVou/YfMBZICZ-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list