From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EIREw-0005NQ-PU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:35:55 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8MDSaIV016078; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:28:36 GMT Received: from smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8MDPXRj024963 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:25:34 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j8MDXfMW005637 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:33:42 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:30:21 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] "Commercial" software in portage From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4331E4F5.3090506@gentoo.org> References: <20050921172801.42BBEF5C20@mail.deploylinux.net> <1127325465.30787.58.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <4331E4F5.3090506@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-rcGW4EgHGG4LWzlNfzlF" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:30:20 -0400 Message-Id: <1127395820.24269.31.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Archives-Salt: df5e89a0-4b17-44ae-a894-47140d99a699 X-Archives-Hash: a8635df4235dc1679d309eb784d08a0d --=-rcGW4EgHGG4LWzlNfzlF Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 17:55 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote: > Is this just a one-off implementation until GLEP 23 is implemented, or > something that will complement it? Whats going to happen to this data > after GLEP23 gets implemented? I'd hate to see something added simply > because its a quick one-off solution to make something work. I'd rather > see people focus on the actual GLEP and moving it along. Of course, if > this data will just be an added feature of GLEP23, I don't see a problem. This really has nothing to do with GLEP23, as it isn't related to any kind of grouping, or ACCEPT_LICENSE. It is simply a marker to say to our users: "Hey, you have to buy this for it to work." That is something that GLEP23 does not provide for in any way. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-rcGW4EgHGG4LWzlNfzlF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDMrHskT4lNIS36YERAt1VAKCJX6cxvm+cEtMhb0GCf/92hYBIKwCbBQcV p1ruS4Cd7TEEDFInNHTJdfQ= =LrqZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-rcGW4EgHGG4LWzlNfzlF-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list