From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGKkX-0002dm-J5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 18:15:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8GIA1x6027979; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 18:10:01 GMT Received: from ctb-mesg6.saix.net (ctb-mesg6.saix.net [196.25.240.86]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8GI8CGi015261 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 18:08:12 GMT Received: from gateway.lan (wblv-146-223-181.telkomadsl.co.za [165.146.223.181]) by ctb-mesg6.saix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC02B6E74 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:13:19 +0200 (SAST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gateway.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3AE3A248E for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:47:24 +0200 (SAST) Received: from gateway.lan ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gateway.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22962-12 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:47:11 +0200 (SAST) Received: from lycan.lan (lycan.lan [192.168.0.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gateway.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509A83A241D for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:47:11 +0200 (SAST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting From: Martin Schlemmer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200509161942.37010.pauldv@gentoo.org> References: <20050915205149.GB22270@vino.zko.hp.com> <1126821468.23324.84.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <200509151820.57057.vapier@gentoo.org> <200509161942.37010.pauldv@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-kfNCM6SYHRcjQ0TL1GgS" Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:14:08 +0200 Message-Id: <1126894448.5006.93.camel@lycan.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at nosferatu.za.org X-Archives-Salt: c25332d3-17b0-43c3-89c5-0d93678c7edd X-Archives-Hash: 7b4dcf5cb1d9f7594b570d578b4ede4a --=-kfNCM6SYHRcjQ0TL1GgS Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 19:42 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > On Friday 16 September 2005 00:20, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > actually this is came up in the meeting as something we would like to s= ee > > spelled out explicitly ... either as a GLEP itself or as a policy updat= e to > > current stabilization practices > > > > the GLEP was approved on the grounds that we need an x86 team and that = it > > needs to be treated as any other arch ... arch team interaction with > > maintainers should be spelled out clearly rather than part of a single > > sentence '... or make individual arrangements with the x86 arch team.' >=20 > Ok, I do think that we will need a way for the maintainer to indicate tha= t the=20 > package is stable. I'd be happy to leave stabilizing out of my hands, but= I=20 > wouldn't want my packages to be stabilized before I deem it stable. >=20 File a bug if the arches (or main ones at least) haven't picked it up yet? Will make the problem of missing some or other keyword minimal (especially for some obscure package not often used). --=20 Martin Schlemmer --=-kfNCM6SYHRcjQ0TL1GgS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDKwtwqburzKaJYLYRAji7AKCKQA7prIkBmfmnV/ZzIdsp26dGvACggBJP zncNNhuzxzQ/glu0/qgv8zk= =huKR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-kfNCM6SYHRcjQ0TL1GgS-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list