From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGJzh-0001P4-M4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:27:26 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8GHKvpg029208; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:20:57 GMT Received: from smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8GHI6be006265 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:18:06 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j8GHP36E007764 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:25:03 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:21:57 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Portability eclass From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200509161833.36291@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> References: <200509161743.07528@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <200509161159.05326.vapier@gentoo.org> <200509161833.36291@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Cf3xLEH7tXWjvB0FfSfK" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:21:57 -0400 Message-Id: <1126891317.23324.128.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Archives-Salt: f585b089-8509-44a8-ae03-6828fa13adcc X-Archives-Hash: fa993ebc3a7ac016e20cedef09af4294 --=-Cf3xLEH7tXWjvB0FfSfK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 18:33 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten=C3=B2 wrote: > On Friday 16 September 2005 17:59, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i dont see this being really useful ... either way, assuming the manpag= e is > > compressed with gzip (or compressed at all) is wrong > Doesn't portage always gzip manpages? No, it can bzip2 them, also. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-Cf3xLEH7tXWjvB0FfSfK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDKv80kT4lNIS36YERApZ9AKCVXj1OQccQPMiH9oiKXtV6Tq7+FACfSjuw t2GHXU9irwyEs3zouKORgcY= =lw+6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Cf3xLEH7tXWjvB0FfSfK-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list