public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Clarification of packages cd's for 2005.1
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 08:54:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1126875245.23324.95.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050916144447.499E.NICK@rout.co.nz>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1401 bytes --]

On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 14:51 +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
> According to the release announcement the package cd's don't seem to
> have an athlon version any more. http://www.gentoo.org/news/20050808-annoncement-release-2005.1.xml
> (the choices seem to be alpha amd64 ppc (32 bit) ppc (64 bit) sparc64
> x86).

Only the base arches get distributed on the mirrors due to space
constraints.

> However on http://tracker.netdomination.org/ there are package cd's for
> a whole lot of other sub-arches -  i686, athlon-xp, P3, P4 and more. Are these official gentoo - if not can anyone tell me about their origin and reliability?

They were built by the Release Engineering team using the exact same
specifications as the rest of the media.  Currently, these are only
available from the Friends of Gentoo e.V. tracker.  We hope to have them
available from the store shortly.  Unfortunately, we just don't have the
resources on our community mirrors for hosting them.

> Also is "athlon-xp" compatible with "athlon"? Or should I go for i686?

No.  You need i686.  Athlon XP added SSE instructions to the Athlon.

> Actually using i686 could be a bonus as it would mean I could share
> binaries between my desktop and my p3 laptop, which is compiled for 686.

Sounds like a plan.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-16 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-16  2:51 [gentoo-dev] Clarification of packages cd's for 2005.1 Nick Rout
2005-09-16 12:54 ` Chris Gianelloni [this message]
2005-09-16 20:23   ` Nick Rout
2005-09-16 20:31     ` Brian Harring
2005-09-16 20:47     ` Lars Weiler
2005-09-16 21:20     ` Chris Gianelloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1126875245.23324.95.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net \
    --to=wolf31o2@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox