From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EG1oR-0006yK-O3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:02:36 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8FLuAGV007028; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:56:10 GMT Received: from smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8FLs2qQ026820 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:54:02 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j8FLxvQs027527 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:59:57 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:57:48 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1126819556.25404.2.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> References: <20050915205149.GB22270@vino.zko.hp.com> <1126819556.25404.2.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-YTgAwK4/zArVFwYw0RZE" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:57:47 -0400 Message-Id: <1126821468.23324.84.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Archives-Salt: c0402827-0e5d-4b22-bfbe-f733b35f71a2 X-Archives-Hash: e57bb29487a56d9b2002893949801b92 --=-YTgAwK4/zArVFwYw0RZE Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 17:25 -0400, Olivier Crete wrote: > What does that glep mean anyways ? Appart from the creation of the x86 > team, is there any action to be taken? > - Is the maint keyword approved? No. It was a suggestion, but was never added to the GLEP. > - Does it mean that devs who are not part of the x86 team can't move > packages from ~x86 to x86 ? Correct. They can, however, make previous arrangements with the x86 arch team to allow them to stabilize their own packages. What this says is "I acknowledge that anything that I break or that breaks on x86 with my package, I get to fix and is not the responsibility of the x86 arch team." The x86 team will keep a list of these developers. This is similar (or identical) to how other arch teams work. For example, I'm not a member of the amd64 arch team, but they know I have an amd64 and use it as my primary development box, so I have made arrangements with them so I can ~amd64 -> amd64 my own packages. If something breaks, I pick up the pieces, not them. > - Is there something else I failed to read? Not that I'm aware of. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-YTgAwK4/zArVFwYw0RZE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDKe5bkT4lNIS36YERAr9tAJ423ahzMl5aiHq/Z/lKnouCeT0CRgCZAUMo h6xF+U8VC9rgk5mTJGaWdSg= =yuwL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-YTgAwK4/zArVFwYw0RZE-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list