From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EG1IS-0003Nv-Ph for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:29:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8FLNjTH019964; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:23:45 GMT Received: from mail.max-t.com (h216-18-124-229.gtcust.grouptelecom.net [216.18.124.229]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8FLL1cw010594 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:21:01 GMT Received: from cocagne.max-t.internal ([192.168.1.124]) by mail.max-t.com with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1EG1Ex-0003Yr-0P for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:25:58 -0400 From: Olivier Crete To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20050915205149.GB22270@vino.zko.hp.com> References: <20050915205149.GB22270@vino.zko.hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Organization: Gentoo Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:25:55 -0400 Message-Id: <1126819556.25404.2.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.124 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tester@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on mx X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1+cvs (built Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:35:17 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.max-t.com) X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j8FLL1cw010594 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id j8FLNjUr019964 X-Archives-Salt: c6a38f5a-6a0f-49cf-867c-72f374e78ad4 X-Archives-Hash: 8704d21477cd514155b847121f4f44c8 On Thu, 2005-15-09 at 16:51 -0400, Aron Griffis wrote: > > 3. glep40: Standardizing "arch" keywording across all archs > > Vote asked by Grant Goodyear >=20 > Approved. What does that glep mean anyways ? Appart from the creation of the x86 team, is there any action to be taken? - Is the maint keyword approved?=20 - Does it mean that devs who are not part of the x86 team can't move packages from ~x86 to x86 ? - Is there something else I failed to read? --=20 Olivier Cr=C3=AAte tester@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer x86 Security Liaison --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list