From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EFGeo-0003GZ-00 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:41:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8DJaE91021945; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:36:14 GMT Received: from smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8DJYZYE030751 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:34:35 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j8DJe6NZ001104 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:40:06 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:38:02 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted ebuilds which are tagged REVIEWED From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20050913193130.4a89fb10@snowdrop.home> References: <20050913011329.1f9f5448@snowdrop.home> <1126611550.10870.2.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> <14410300453.20050913140803@gentoo.org> <1126623154.23324.9.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050913193130.4a89fb10@snowdrop.home> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-s61spIFHQlzqz3TCh+l3" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:38:01 -0400 Message-Id: <1126640281.23324.27.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Archives-Salt: 419b38c3-1d7d-4c04-9bad-bafe3b8d51a7 X-Archives-Hash: b2e438453ecbe195d6d5d5c49d84da5b --=-s61spIFHQlzqz3TCh+l3 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 19:31 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:52:33 -0400 Chris Gianelloni > wrote: > | > Uhm, if the ebuild submitter does not choose a category, then we'd > | > have to change the subject ourselves (and sometimes I'm not even > | > remotely sure into which category would the particular ebuild fit). > |=20 > | Try asking the submitter? *grin* >=20 > Yeah, I reckon we could stick a rough category in the title before we > tag stuff as REVIEWED. Sometimes it might end up as games-?/whatever > rather than a full category though. That would be fine. In fact, it would be fine if it were just *somewhere* in the bug report, except for the automated message you're going to be sending out would be much more useful if it were in the summary, even if it is just a rough idea. Remember that not *everything* will need the summary there right away, since not every request for clarification will be immediately answered, but increasing the likelihood of the category being there increases the likelihood of the package being picked up. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-s61spIFHQlzqz3TCh+l3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDJyqZkT4lNIS36YERAq6vAKCFI94Osg+aS2njkXYfdsMeEskIFwCfbQyL idPPdQEhO5p7bZlt21Q22k8= =ugPt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-s61spIFHQlzqz3TCh+l3-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list