From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EFApY-00053X-R3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:28:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8DDMpJZ005820; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:22:51 GMT Received: from mail.t-systems.cz (mail.t-systems.cz [212.67.76.249]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8DDL5xj013255 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:21:05 GMT Received: from mefisto.t-systems.cz (faust.t-systems.cz [10.246.110.12]) by mail.t-systems.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27438A2B2 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:25:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from andre.t-systems.cz ([10.246.112.240]) by mefisto.t-systems.cz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:25:32 +0200 Received: andre.t-systems.cz 10.246.112.240 from 10.246.112.176 10.246.112.176 via HTTP with MS-WebStorage 6.5.6944 Received: from frankies by andre.t-systems.cz; 13 Sep 2005 15:24:39 +0200 Subject: [gentoo-dev] Bug 80905 From: Frank Schafer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:24:38 +0200 Message-Id: <1126617879.5910.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Sep 2005 13:25:32.0599 (UTC) FILETIME=[9DF21470:01C5B866] X-T-Systems_Czech-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-T-Systems_Czech-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-5.865, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -3.30, AWL 0.03, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-MailScanner-From: frank.schafer@t-systems.cz X-Archives-Salt: d339051d-4e87-4f64-8506-a98a7aedb5ef X-Archives-Hash: 9c83a170adda3451888db9a424aa888f Hello, this bug is from 2005-02-05. It was reported again (in this thread) 2005-02-10. I hit the same behavior 2005-09-08. internal compiler error: segmentation fault during emerge Xorg The bug is simply reproducible (emerge Xorg) at the same line of code. The bug is still marked as NEW. Donnie Berkholz replied 2005-02-10 with: "Could you humor me and try with a vanilla kernel?" My questions here: Does someone have a look at this? I think a not installable Xorg is severe enough to mark it as CRITICAL. Does someone know if it's worth a try with the vanilla and if vanilla here means a really vanilla from kernel.org or if it's sufficient to get the (too patched and thus not so vanilla) vanilla-sources. Please be kind with me regarding to the fact that I'm posting here. On the gentoo mailing list I get only replies like: "You probably have faulty memory." If THIS would be the fact the bug would show up randomly in different ebuilds or at least at different lines of code. Thanks in advance for every hint Frank -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list