[gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted ebuilds which are tagged REVIEWED

[gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted ebuilds which are tagged REVIEWED

[Ciaran McCreesh]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2108 bytes --]

This is a summary of maintainer-wanted packages which are tagged as
REVIEWED.  Please take a few moments to glance over this list and see
if there are any packages which your herd would like.

The REVIEWED tag is used for ebuilds which have been checked for basic
syntax and style issues. It does NOT mean that the ebuild actually works
(although it might), merely that you probably won't have to spend too
long fixing basic stuff.

This list is automagically generated. It will be sent to the gentoo-dev
mailing list at irregular intervals until someone asks me to stop.

 74713: pdx-1.6.1 (new package)
 81172: New ebuild for mp3report
 81622: [New ebuild] fileschanged-0.6.1
 81641: [New ebuild] cfilesplit-0.2
 88638: New package - sparsehash-0.1
 93711: avi2mpeg-1.0 (new package)
 96793: gimp-stitch-0.9.6 (New Package)
 99009: add cowbell to the portagetree
 99248: kps-0.2.ebuild (New Package)
 99307: Baobab (New ebuild)
 99724: podpooper-0.1.0 (New Package)
 99999: faumachine-20050720.ebuild (new package)
100043: DenyHosts-0.9.0.ebuild (New Package)
100108: yacy-0.39.20050722.425 (New Package)
101523: New ebuild: sys-apps/rrdcollect
101541: gkfreq - gkrellm plugin (new ebuild).
101751: gbo-1.0.ebuild (New Package)
102187: unicode-0.4.7.ebuild (New Package)
102323: gerris-0.6.0.ebuild (new package)
102449: MegaTunix-0.7.9.ebuild (New Package)
102919: rovclock-0.6c.ebuild
102928: ebuild for media-sound/lltag
102931: Ebuild for media-gfx/llgal
102996: gloox-0.6 (new package)
104011: net-misc/ncp (new package)
104018: net-ftp/cmdftp (new package)
104024: net-misc/nat-traverse (new package)
104027: app-crypt/tthsum (new package)
104032: dev-lang/srf (new package)
104219: jgnash-1.9.2.ebuild (New Package)
104628: japa ebuild
105137: libntlm-0.3.7.ebuild (New Package)
105227: Kupu 1.3 (new ebuild)
105438: earth3d-1.0.3.ebuild (New Package)

This is a total of 34 bugs.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted ebuilds which are tagged REVIEWED

[Chris Gianelloni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 973 bytes --]

On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 01:13 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> This list is automagically generated. It will be sent to the gentoo-dev
> mailing list at irregular intervals until someone asks me to stop.

I know that this is automatically generated, but can we either change
the bug subjects or figure out some way to add proposed categories to
these?  I think changing the summary should suffice.  For the ones with
categories, I can pretty much figure out what they are.  For the ones
without, I have no clue and have to look at the bug to determine if I
would even be interested in it.

>  74713: pdx-1.6.1 (new package)

Bad.

> 101541: gkfreq - gkrellm plugin (new ebuild).

Good (even without category)

> 102928: ebuild for media-sound/lltag

Good.  While I don't know what it is exactly, I at least have an idea
that it is sound-related.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted ebuilds which are tagged REVIEWED

[Jakub Moc]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 917 bytes --]


13.9.2005, 13:39:10, Chris Gianelloni wrote:


> I know that this is automatically generated, but can we either change
> the bug subjects or figure out some way to add proposed categories to
> these?  I think changing the summary should suffice.  For the ones with
> categories, I can pretty much figure out what they are.  For the ones
> without, I have no clue and have to look at the bug to determine if I
> would even be interested in it.

Uhm, if the ebuild submitter does not choose a category, then we'd have to
change the subject ourselves (and sometimes I'm not even remotely sure into
which category would the particular ebuild fit).

*shrug*

-- 
Best regards,

 Jakub Moc
 mailto:jakub@gentoo.org
 GPG signature: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95  B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E

 ... still no signature ;)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 183 bytes --]

Re: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted ebuilds which are tagged REVIEWED

[Chris Gianelloni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1329 bytes --]

On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 14:08 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> 13.9.2005, 13:39:10, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> 
> 
> > I know that this is automatically generated, but can we either change
> > the bug subjects or figure out some way to add proposed categories to
> > these?  I think changing the summary should suffice.  For the ones with
> > categories, I can pretty much figure out what they are.  For the ones
> > without, I have no clue and have to look at the bug to determine if I
> > would even be interested in it.
> 
> Uhm, if the ebuild submitter does not choose a category, then we'd have to
> change the subject ourselves (and sometimes I'm not even remotely sure into
> which category would the particular ebuild fit).

Try asking the submitter? *grin*

Here's a good example.  If I submitted an ebuild for "nwn" what would
you think it might be?  What if I submitted it as "games-rpg/nwn"
instead?  Now, a category isn't *required* of there's a decent
description (such as the "gkrellm plugin" description shown as an
example).  The point being that nobody is going to be able to determine
what some of these packages are without some serious investigation, as
they tend to have cryptic names.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted ebuilds which are tagged REVIEWED

[Ciaran McCreesh]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 720 bytes --]

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:52:33 -0400 Chris Gianelloni
<wolf31o2@gentoo.org> wrote:
| > Uhm, if the ebuild submitter does not choose a category, then we'd
| > have to change the subject ourselves (and sometimes I'm not even
| > remotely sure into which category would the particular ebuild fit).
| 
| Try asking the submitter? *grin*

Yeah, I reckon we could stick a rough category in the title before we
tag stuff as REVIEWED. Sometimes it might end up as games-?/whatever
rather than a full category though.

Jakub -- this okay with you?

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted ebuilds which are tagged REVIEWED

[Jakub Moc]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1028 bytes --]


13.9.2005, 20:31:30, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:

> On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:52:33 -0400 Chris Gianelloni
> <wolf31o2@gentoo.org> wrote:
| >> Uhm, if the ebuild submitter does not choose a category, then we'd
| >> have to change the subject ourselves (and sometimes I'm not even
| >> remotely sure into which category would the particular ebuild fit).
> | 
> | Try asking the submitter? *grin*

> Yeah, I reckon we could stick a rough category in the title before we
> tag stuff as REVIEWED. Sometimes it might end up as games-?/whatever
> rather than a full category though.

> Jakub -- this okay with you?

Sure, I've already managed to delete all the bugspam this caused... *g*

But yeah, it's good for some rough orientation, at least blah-?/ebuild if
unsure.


-- 
Best regards,

 Jakub Moc
 mailto:jakub@gentoo.org
 GPG signature: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95  B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E

 ... still no signature ;)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 183 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted ebuilds which are tagged REVIEWED

[Ciaran McCreesh]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 632 bytes --]

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:57:24 +0200 Jakub Moc <jakub@gentoo.org> wrote:
| Sure, I've already managed to delete all the bugspam this caused...
| *g*

Yeah, maintainer-wanted bug emails are a pain in the ass. How about we
turn off email sending for:

* I'm added to or removed from this capacity
* Priority, status, severity, and/or milestone changes
* Keywords field changes
* CC field changes

Anyone know the maintainer-wanted bugzilla password? :)

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted ebuilds which are tagged REVIEWED

[Jakub Moc]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 894 bytes --]


13.9.2005, 21:08:43, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:

> On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:57:24 +0200 Jakub Moc <jakub@gentoo.org> wrote:
> | Sure, I've already managed to delete all the bugspam this caused...
> | *g*

> Yeah, maintainer-wanted bug emails are a pain in the ass. How about we
> turn off email sending for:

> * I'm added to or removed from this capacity
> * Priority, status, severity, and/or milestone changes
> * Keywords field changes
> * CC field changes

> Anyone know the maintainer-wanted bugzilla password? :)

Not entirely sure about the keywords thing, other than that - kplznowtnx ;)
Someone who has the privs to do it?

-- 
Best regards,

 Jakub Moc
 mailto:jakub@gentoo.org
 GPG signature: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95  B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E

 ... still no signature ;)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 183 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted ebuilds which are tagged REVIEWED

[Chris Gianelloni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 231 bytes --]

On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 20:08 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> * Keywords field changes

Wouldn't you *want* to see these?

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted ebuilds which are tagged REVIEWED

[Ciaran McCreesh]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 524 bytes --]

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:50:50 -0400 Chris Gianelloni
<wolf31o2@gentoo.org> wrote:
| On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 20:08 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > * Keywords field changes
| 
| Wouldn't you *want* to see these?

Mmm, I suppose maybe someone might try to sneak a REVIEWED add past us.
I've switched the other three off but left keyword changes on.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted ebuilds which are tagged REVIEWED

[Chris Gianelloni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1219 bytes --]

On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 19:31 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:52:33 -0400 Chris Gianelloni
> <wolf31o2@gentoo.org> wrote:
> | > Uhm, if the ebuild submitter does not choose a category, then we'd
> | > have to change the subject ourselves (and sometimes I'm not even
> | > remotely sure into which category would the particular ebuild fit).
> | 
> | Try asking the submitter? *grin*
> 
> Yeah, I reckon we could stick a rough category in the title before we
> tag stuff as REVIEWED. Sometimes it might end up as games-?/whatever
> rather than a full category though.

That would be fine.  In fact, it would be fine if it were just
*somewhere* in the bug report, except for the automated message you're
going to be sending out would be much more useful if it were in the
summary, even if it is just a rough idea.  Remember that not
*everything* will need the summary there right away, since not every
request for clarification will be immediately answered, but increasing
the likelihood of the category being there increases the likelihood of
the package being picked up.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted ebuilds which are tagged REVIEWED

[Ciaran McCreesh]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2966 bytes --]

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 07:39:10 -0400 Chris Gianelloni
<wolf31o2@gentoo.org> wrote:
| I know that this is automatically generated, but can we either change
| the bug subjects or figure out some way to add proposed categories to
| these?  I think changing the summary should suffice.  For the ones
| with categories, I can pretty much figure out what they are.  For the
| ones without, I have no clue and have to look at the bug to determine
| if I would even be interested in it.

Okay, I've gone through and added in approximate categories to the
subjects where possible. A few I'm really not sure about, if anyone
wants to tinker feel free.

This is a summary of maintainer-wanted packages which are tagged as
REVIEWED.  Please take a few moments to glance over this list and see
if there are any packages which your herd would like.

The REVIEWED tag is used for ebuilds which have been checked for basic
syntax and style issues. It does NOT mean that the ebuild actually works
(although it might), merely that you probably won't have to spend too
long fixing basic stuff.

This list is automagically generated. It will be sent to the gentoo-dev
mailing list at irregular intervals until someone asks me to stop.

 42572: kde-misc/kxdocker ebuild - 
 74713: app-text/pdx-1.6.1 (new package)
 81172: media-?/mp3report (new package)
 81622: app-misc/fileschanged-0.6.1 (new package)
 81641: app-misc/cfilesplit-0.2 (new package)
 93711: media-?/avi2mpeg-1.0 (new package)
 96793: media-gfx/gimp-stitch-0.9.6 (New Package)
 99009: media-sound/cowbell (new package)
 99248: kde-?/kps-0.2.ebuild (New Package)
 99999: sci-?/faumachine-20050720.ebuild (new package)
100043: app-admin/DenyHosts-0.9.0.ebuild (New Package)
100108: net-misc/yacy-0.39.20050722.425 (New Package)
101523: New ebuild: sys-apps/rrdcollect
101541: x11-plugins/gkfreq - gkrellm plugin (new ebuild).
101751: games-misc/gbo-1.0.ebuild (New Package)
102187: app-text/unicode-0.4.7.ebuild (New Package)
102323: sci-geosciences/gerris-0.6.0.ebuild (new package)
102449: app-misc/megatunix-0.7.9.ebuild (New Package)
102928: ebuild for media-sound/lltag
102931: Ebuild for media-gfx/llgal
102996: net-libs/gloox-0.6 (new package)
104011: net-misc/ncp (new package)
104018: net-ftp/cmdftp (new package)
104024: net-misc/nat-traverse (new package)
104027: app-crypt/tthsum (new package)
104032: dev-lang/srf (new package)
104219: app-office/jgnash-1.9.2.ebuild (New Package)
104628: media-?/japa ebuild
105137: net-libs/libntlm-0.3.7.ebuild (New Package)
105227: net-zope/Kupu 1.3 (new ebuild)
105253: dev-db/pxlib
105438: earth3d-1.0.3.ebuild (New Package)
105482: sci-?/basemap-0.6.2 (new ebuild)
105671: media-?/mpck-0.10.ebuild (New Package)

This is a total of 34 bugs.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted ebuilds which are tagged REVIEWED

[Chris Gianelloni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 395 bytes --]

On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 19:53 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Okay, I've gone through and added in approximate categories to the
> subjects where possible. A few I'm really not sure about, if anyone
> wants to tinker feel free.

Excellent!

This is definitely appreciated.  Thanks.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]