From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EEvwI-00052r-EX
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:34:11 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j8CLSOLM026987;
	Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:28:24 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8CLPL4E027798
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:25:21 GMT
Received: from dsl-082-083-198-022.arcor-ip.net ([82.83.198.22] helo=[10.0.0.13])
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EEvs4-0003jM-1m
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:29:48 +0000
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC
From: Patrick Lauer <patrick@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <20050912205326.GW9414@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu>
References: <4325D12A.5050601@gentoo.org>
	 <1126555733.6559.7.camel@localhost>
	 <20050912205326.GW9414@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-jDfZ7o7ZcF5ODoBKsm6P"
Organization: Gentoo
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:29:45 +0200
Message-Id: <1126560585.7339.5.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 
X-Archives-Salt: 0144c381-7a40-47d4-b972-d09967e8d7bd
X-Archives-Hash: 4b1aee5bad2a37121691d249db088414


--=-jDfZ7o7ZcF5ODoBKsm6P
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 15:53 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Patrick Lauer wrote: [Mon Sep 12 2005, 03:08:53PM CDT]
> > I'd like to see the following items added:
> > glep 15: script repository (working prototype has existed for some time=
)
> I'm not quite sure what you're adding.  GLEP 15 was approved quite some
> time ago.  "All" that remains is to finish up the implementation.
or rather move it from gentooexperimental.org to "official" gentoo infrastr=
ucture (?)

> > QA: Preventing tree breakage and improving quality
> > GLEP31 (The UTF-8 Glep) would be dependant on a QA team that can
> > actually fix things and should be resurrected from its frozen state.
> Huh?  Why should Mr_Bones_ need to go around fixing broken encodings?
> He just has to break the legs of the offending devs....
Would be better if
(1) it wasn't Mr_Bones alone and
(2) there was an agreed on policy so that (if needed) repeat offenders
can be sanctioned
(e.g. by flipping their commit bit)
that of course needs some backing from the general dev population and
devrel, also the policies should be properly defined so that noone can
weasel out by invoking "it's always been like this"

I hope I'm not alone in my quest for higher QA standards :-)

wkr,
Patrick

--=20
Stand still, and let the rest of the universe move

--=-jDfZ7o7ZcF5ODoBKsm6P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDJfNJqER3hOUoZM4RAoqGAJ9JEJog7M44Ar884kHL4r//0ron3QCeJIQh
n2xqlL0edPob4OPPYD+GhMg=
=tSw4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-jDfZ7o7ZcF5ODoBKsm6P--

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list