public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:03:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1126533798.455.23.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200509121356.02558.carlo@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2007 bytes --]

On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 13:55 +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> On Monday 12 September 2005 02:25, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > If you're not up for having your code reviewed, don't contribute to an
> > open source project. No-one expects you to produce perfect code
> > straight off (at least, we don't until we give you commit access). We
> > *do* expect you to be prepared to respond to constructive criticism and
> > improve your code.
> 
> Personally I think you're just going a bit wild by closing the bug reports as 
> wont fix and expecting users to fix them. That's part of developers job, if 
> someone takes into account adding an ebuild to the official tree, isn't it?! 
> While I can understand your motivation, I'd like to know if your doing is 
> backed up by at least an informal decision (didn't follow the threads which 
> resulted in the maintainer* aliases, etc.), because we have enough whining 
> guys, who don't understand that our ressources are limited. Caring for the 
> quality of stuff, that is not part of the official tree is only bad PR, but 
> not a win for us, imho.

We generally handle this in games not by marking it WONTFIX (except
rarely) but instead by simply leaving it open, and commenting to the
users what they need to fix before it would be included.  We aren't 100%
stringent on what we require users to fix, and many times we'll fix it
ourselves if it isn't that much and simply note it in the bug for the
user to see.  This tends to lead to users providing better ebuilds in
the future, and also lessens user frustration.  Many users seem to think
that a WONTFIX is non-negotiable.  I tend to agree with them, for the
most part.  Rather than WONTFIX them, simply tell them that they won't
be included as-is.  WONTFIX gives the user the impression that we are
not interested in their work or the package, when this is not the case.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-12 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-11 13:58 [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date Peter Hyman
2005-09-11 15:50 ` Maurice van der Pot
2005-09-11 16:42   ` Peter Hyman
2005-09-11 19:24     ` Maurice van der Pot
2005-09-11 21:02     ` Alin Nastac
2005-09-12  0:10       ` Aron Griffis
2005-09-12  7:04         ` Alin Nastac
2005-09-12  0:14       ` Peter Hyman
2005-09-12  0:25         ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-09-12  0:38           ` Alec Warner
2005-09-12 11:55           ` Carsten Lohrke
2005-09-12 14:03             ` Chris Gianelloni [this message]
2005-09-12 14:26               ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2005-09-12 14:28               ` Maurice van der Pot
2005-09-12 15:41                 ` Peter Hyman
2005-09-12 16:12                   ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-09-12 17:00                     ` Peter Hyman
2005-09-12 17:12                       ` Jan Kundrát
2005-09-12 17:25                       ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-09-12 17:51                       ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-09-12 17:03             ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-09-12 17:32               ` Carsten Lohrke
2005-09-12 17:40                 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-09-12 17:56                 ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2005-09-12 18:53                   ` Carsten Lohrke
2005-09-12 19:21                     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-09-13  0:20                       ` Nathan L. Adams
2005-09-12 19:26                     ` [gentoo-dev] " Dan Meltzer
2005-09-12  0:27         ` [gentoo-dev] " Stephen P. Becker
2005-09-12  0:36           ` Peter Hyman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1126533798.455.23.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net \
    --to=wolf31o2@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox