From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata revised - removal of packages
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 09:57:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1126274228.29257.48.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43218E3D.3080206@egr.msu.edu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1487 bytes --]
On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 09:29 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> > and then what ? if you're proposing removal of packages due solely to no
> > maintainer, then we're going to have to slap you around. dont remove
> > packages for that reason alone.
> > -mike
>
> So I guess the idea would then be, how do you find packages in the tree
> where dev FooGuy once maintained it but no longer does (because FooGuy
> left) and the package is old and nasty and no one cares about it. Leave
> it in the tree anyway? I certainly don't want unmaintained CRAP in the
> tree, although unmaintained decent programs are good. By decent I mean
> programs that are generally so old they never have version bumps ;)
The simple rule is leave it the hell alone. If it is completely broken,
there will be bugs filed. If nobody steps up to claim the package,
then, and only then, is it removed.
Did you look at the list of packages? I mean, how exactly broken can
"descent1-maps" get? *grin*
Package removal because it has no maintainer would probably remove a
large portion of the tree, possibly even packages that are necessary for
many people. There's quite a few packages that get maintained simply by
people fixing problems with them, but with no real "maintainer". While
this isn't the best solution, removing them from the tree just for this
reason is asinine.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-09 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-09 9:58 [gentoo-dev] metadata revised - removal of packages Torsten Veller
2005-09-09 12:24 ` Jakub Moc
2005-09-09 12:46 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-09-09 13:29 ` Alec Warner
2005-09-09 13:57 ` Chris Gianelloni [this message]
2005-09-09 15:23 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-09-09 16:06 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-09-09 13:35 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-09-09 16:10 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-09-09 17:36 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-09-09 17:49 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-09-09 18:08 ` Ciaran McCreesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1126274228.29257.48.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net \
--to=wolf31o2@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox