From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EDTDa-0001eY-QV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 20:41:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j88KbZIf022734; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 20:37:35 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j88KZ3YF028682 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 20:35:03 GMT Received: from [83.218.6.121] (helo=dogmatix.willow.local) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EDTAT-0005oX-R5 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 20:38:46 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] USE="minimal" for kernel sources From: John Mylchreest <johnm@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <43209BB0.7050602@gentoo.org> References: <431C97C4.3070406@gentoo.org> <1126203005.5845.81.camel@alto> <200509082017.33985@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <1126206101.9553.5.camel@localhost> <43209BB0.7050602@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-JRWmU0xL2yYBR37KM9/T" Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 21:35:30 +0100 Message-Id: <1126211730.9553.19.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 X-Archives-Salt: 001395c8-0f0a-4f06-98fa-13e4474cea4f X-Archives-Hash: 089ce85ca9ef7cf73155d0c09746499f --=-JRWmU0xL2yYBR37KM9/T Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 22:14 +0200, Jan Kundr=C3=A1t wrote: > Er, but why is this a problem? Does it matter that the package will > install different files on x86 than on mips? Or am I just overlooking > the point? In general, there is no obvious technical reason against individual installs differing from one another, however from a support and QA point of view it makes it a much less trivial issue. At the end of the day, when it comes to USE=3Dminimal no-one can fully confirm what does, and does not exist (can cause breakages may I add) when it comes to supporting a bug, and also we can't promise it wont destroy an arch tree which you need. I'm thinking obscure (or not quite so) architecture. Pegasos, Sun, Sparc, SH, arm, etc. Although Kbuild is more than capable of functioning with only the required arch tree, what happens when it comes to things like cross-compile, not just of the sources but of anything else which might use them later on? ipw2200? nvidia? alsa-drivers? Just a bit of a worry to me, and not something I would really like to endorse. --=20 Role: Gentoo Linux Kernel Lead Gentoo Linux: http://www.gentoo.org Public Key: gpg --recv-keys 9C745515 Key fingerprint: A0AF F3C8 D699 A05A EC5C 24F7 95AA 241D 9C74 5515 --=-JRWmU0xL2yYBR37KM9/T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDIKCSz7mlh8wQzGMRAvmUAKCDi6aDMg/qtS4zc8/RpC7icmJBowCdElHA iUezXCEEknmLfwAgpNSSyuM= =lhzz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-JRWmU0xL2yYBR37KM9/T-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list