From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EClLB-00084g-G6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 21:50:53 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j86LkSmI017416; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 21:46:28 GMT Received: from ctb-mesg8.saix.net (ctb-mesg8.saix.net [196.25.240.88]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j86LhcoJ023684 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 21:43:38 GMT Received: from gateway.lan (wblv-146-249-139.telkomadsl.co.za [165.146.249.139]) by ctb-mesg8.saix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A9F65B7 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 23:46:28 +0200 (SAST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gateway.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0C83A248C for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 23:20:44 +0200 (SAST) Received: from gateway.lan ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gateway.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32291-06 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 23:20:32 +0200 (SAST) Received: from lycan.lan (lycan.lan [192.168.0.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gateway.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FEC03A241D for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 23:20:32 +0200 (SAST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep From: Martin Schlemmer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20050906223119.06c9b530@snowdrop.home> References: <20050904143711.GD23576@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <1125863332.11366.89.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050904210535.24ab8a39@snowdrop.home> <1125865598.11360.122.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050904205307.GG23576@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <1125869984.11364.143.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050906152209.GA9825@gentoo.org> <1126034976.10430.3.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <431DEF83.6070701@gentoo.org> <20050906204747.60753c4e@snowdrop.home> <1126041584.30327.42.camel@lycan.lan> <20050906223119.06c9b530@snowdrop.home> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-QmjRpBAA+WHK89A+CnGs" Organization: Gentoo Foundation Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 23:47:20 +0200 Message-Id: <1126043240.30327.45.camel@lycan.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.3.8 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at nosferatu.za.org X-Archives-Salt: e80dbe78-5534-49b2-b7d3-f96199cee4f8 X-Archives-Hash: 0e52d1b087447ce472571f15fdbedf99 --=-QmjRpBAA+WHK89A+CnGs Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 22:31 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 23:19:43 +0200 Martin Schlemmer > wrote: > | What about !arch or something (to connect with the one reply to the > | summary thread) to really indicate unstable on that arch? Should > | cover those things that sorda work on the arch, but you rather want > | developers or experienced users that can patch bugs to look at it ... >=20 > Those go in per-profile package.masks. It's more flexible than a > keyword. >=20 I would have said a keyword is more flexible (and less work) than package.masks, but I do not put that much value in the idea - was more just to have something more to kick around. --=20 Martin Schlemmer --=-QmjRpBAA+WHK89A+CnGs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDHg5oqburzKaJYLYRAo4gAKCFyKAmLWa7/xi17Tlhczh/KXNePQCfZGKn 98er657rD+cOvQDzMBuR9po= =79xr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-QmjRpBAA+WHK89A+CnGs-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list