From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ECO1K-0003h4-V7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 20:56:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j85Kqw4r022931; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 20:52:58 GMT Received: from myrddraal.demon.co.uk (myrddraal.demon.co.uk [62.49.28.63]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j85KohUu025131 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 20:50:43 GMT Received: from mogheiden.gnqs.org (mogheiden [192.168.0.20]) by myrddraal.demon.co.uk (8.13.3/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j85KvRj1011349 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 21:57:27 +0100 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep From: Stuart Herbert To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20050905213452.2a88279b@snowdrop.home> References: <20050904143711.GD23576@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <1125865598.11360.122.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050904215931.53b9db51@snowdrop.home> <200509042009.37676.morfic@gentoo.org> <1125948029.10669.35.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050905203729.01e6b212@snowdrop.home> <1125951397.10663.79.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050905213452.2a88279b@snowdrop.home> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-iu8oEbvF6I7ASJbRIlvg" Organization: Gentoo Linux Project Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 21:52:56 +0100 Message-Id: <1125953576.10663.90.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 X-Archives-Salt: 5c34c963-6339-41eb-a422-bb6735073008 X-Archives-Hash: d1f81f94fac6e41ee2bcda9070f086e2 --=-iu8oEbvF6I7ASJbRIlvg Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 21:34 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Stabling a package which is not in packahe.mask is only a support > burden if package maintainers are abusing ~arch. > > If you don't agree that it should be stable, don't move it out out of > package.mask. ~arch is for stable candidates, and by sticking a package > you maintain in ~arch you are implicitly asking for it to be tested > with the aim of marking it stable. Which part of "I agree with you" didn't you understand? :( However, it still comes across like you're trying to change the subject, even after being asked not to :( I've put my point across, but you're determined not to address it directly. I guess there's nothing else to say on this topic. Best regards, Stu --=20 Stuart Herbert stuart@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/ GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint =3D 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C -- --=-iu8oEbvF6I7ASJbRIlvg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDHLAnDC+AuvmvxXwRAid0AJ0e8DqWNZogVbXo7Wps7oTX1niOtwCdHVju MXzewINKKELYKaae54q2xRo= =mhWZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-iu8oEbvF6I7ASJbRIlvg-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list