From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ECMYh-0001No-WE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 19:23:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j85JJFsG017166; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 19:19:15 GMT Received: from myrddraal.demon.co.uk (myrddraal.demon.co.uk [62.49.28.63]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j85JHaJW005117 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 19:17:36 GMT Received: from mogheiden.gnqs.org (mogheiden [192.168.0.20]) by myrddraal.demon.co.uk (8.13.3/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j85JOJZA011328 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 20:24:19 +0100 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep From: Stuart Herbert To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200509042009.37676.morfic@gentoo.org> References: <20050904143711.GD23576@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <1125865598.11360.122.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050904215931.53b9db51@snowdrop.home> <200509042009.37676.morfic@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-3TIYMWwRknhPGecxrWzV" Organization: Gentoo Linux Project Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 20:20:28 +0100 Message-Id: <1125948029.10669.35.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 X-Archives-Salt: 5481be66-2c6b-4c49-b1da-15b22bb6c85d X-Archives-Hash: c82e719d00382d1b4ebb93d99f616b36 --=-3TIYMWwRknhPGecxrWzV Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 20:09 -0500, Daniel Goller wrote: > agreed talk/communcation is fine, if the maintainer is only trying to fle= x=20 > muscles and does not have a good reason, the arch team ought to be able t= o do=20 > what is best for gentoo and not be shot down by a (hm) stubborn(?)=20 > maintainer, if the maintaner could do that, the arch team would be quite=20 > limited in its effectiveness That's a good example - one I hope doesn't occur too often ;-) Equally, there'll be times when the roles are reversed, and it's the arch team member flexing muscle. We're all human after all :) Still, it'd only be fair for the arch team to assume the support burden for the package version if they do this w/out the support of the package maintainer. Best regards, Stu --=20 Stuart Herbert stuart@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/ GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint =3D 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C -- --=-3TIYMWwRknhPGecxrWzV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDHJp8DC+AuvmvxXwRArKbAKCVoRnV9JTRctwvov4Bg6JGSoNLWwCfTusu szVk6LQLwF4+VMJ10Pieh2I= =eR6B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-3TIYMWwRknhPGecxrWzV-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list