From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EC2W7-00024G-J9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 21:59:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j84LsGva021704; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 21:54:16 GMT Received: from myrddraal.demon.co.uk (myrddraal.demon.co.uk [62.49.28.63]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j84LpvGJ031536 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 21:51:58 GMT Received: from mogheiden.gnqs.org (mogheiden [192.168.0.20]) by myrddraal.demon.co.uk (8.13.3/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j84LwUaj010645 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 22:58:30 +0100 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tentative x86 arch team glep From: Stuart Herbert To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20050904154552.4c7d1313@enterprise.weeve.org> References: <20050904143711.GD23576@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <1125863332.11366.89.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050904210535.24ab8a39@snowdrop.home> <1125865598.11360.122.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050904205307.GG23576@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <1125869984.11364.143.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20050904154552.4c7d1313@enterprise.weeve.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-tj2LICAENDkYb6DXdhXP" Organization: Gentoo Linux Project Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 22:54:02 +0100 Message-Id: <1125870843.11366.155.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 X-Archives-Salt: 8fba6241-349f-49dc-add6-35048e831c2c X-Archives-Hash: 76663032e194e88984859ed824e4978a --=-tj2LICAENDkYb6DXdhXP Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 15:45 -0600, Jason Wever wrote: > This is the current policy, though it gets violated quite often. Maybe the answer is to have separate trees for arches and general packages then? That would be one solution. (Although not one that I'd personally prefer. I'd rather the package maintainers learned to work within the rules instead.) Best regards, Stu --=20 Stuart Herbert stuart@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/ GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint =3D 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C -- --=-tj2LICAENDkYb6DXdhXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDG2z6DC+AuvmvxXwRAoV+AJ9hcSXaAOdjHFVOUGhqqnuOXxbcvgCgi9UA U8cwF1b0WIn839MyajvSTEo= =uC+y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-tj2LICAENDkYb6DXdhXP-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list