From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EB0kx-0007U4-M5
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 01:54:16 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j821oYUU003979;
	Fri, 2 Sep 2005 01:50:34 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j821mEmX025501
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 01:48:14 GMT
Received: from bl7-64-18.dsl.telepac.pt ([85.240.64.18])
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EB0ha-00066l-Je
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 01:50:46 +0000
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] combining x86 and amd64
From: Luis Medinas <metalgod@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <1125608727.15722.35.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal>
References: <20050901171028.GW18440@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu>
	 <200509011923.58239@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org>
	 <20050901184101.5ed8cadc@snowdrop.home>
	 <200509011950.24494@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org>
	 <20050901190259.31d68edd@snowdrop.home>
	 <1125599804.15722.18.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal>
	 <43174E56.10506@gentoo.org>
	 <1125602760.19807.73.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>
	 <1125608727.15722.35.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 02:47:56 +0000
Message-Id: <1125629276.14483.49.camel@darksystem>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: d8fa4f7f-fb92-4236-960e-74b4dc965f50
X-Archives-Hash: ccde7aba0e2fd8119ec1c6ee1aa1e4e1

On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 17:05 -0400, Olivier Crete wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-01-09 at 15:25 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > So would just making an x86 arch team.  It would also be much less of a
> > problem than merging x86 and amd64.  How about this?  I proclaim and x86
> > arch team now exists.  It already has a security liason.
> > 
> > $ cat /var/mail/alias/arch/x86
> > avenj
> > solar
> > tester
> > port001
> > azarah
> > 
> > Seems that we even have two of our new Council members on the team.
> > Anybody else want to join the team?  Just add yourself to the alias and
> > start paying attention to requests that are submitted to x86@gentoo.org
> > via bugzilla.
> 
> The people maintaining the x86 kernel should also join, as well as the
> release maintainer (chris, is that you?), the grub/lilo maintainers,
> etc... That would be a good start. 
> 
> We should also try to recruit one or two x86 arch testers, hparker has
> offered to help. 
Be ready to test my packages has well. I'm very happy with the formation
of the new x86 arch team i wish you the best and i think this is the way
to improve Gentoo (QA, releases etc..).
You guys need a doc writer too (catch one at #-doc)
And of course i think AT's will have much work to do on the x86 team.
-- 
Luis Medinas <metalgod@gentoo.org>
http://dev.gentoo.org/~metalgod
Gentoo Linux Developer: AMD64,Printing,Media-Optical

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list