From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EAuoh-0000NA-Hh for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 19:33:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j81JULNX004659; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:30:21 GMT Received: from smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j81JR0aw023085 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:27:01 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j81JUJEo001336 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:30:19 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:29:18 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] combining x86 and amd64 From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200509012114.13923@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> References: <20050901171028.GW18440@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> <200509012054.24683@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20050901200258.2deabf33@snowdrop.home> <200509012114.13923@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-z5lJyWo2i+sRrcKHXkbt" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:29:17 -0400 Message-Id: <1125602958.19807.77.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Archives-Salt: 0066ba76-4253-4dc1-95eb-1919dc76741c X-Archives-Hash: e423ce115157265120ff1ec10c63c72c --=-z5lJyWo2i+sRrcKHXkbt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 21:14 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten=C3=B2 wrote: > x86 users =3D a lot, most of the illiterate, ricer, ranting users.. I thought that was amd64? :P Anyway, here's what *I* propose. I propose that we all just shut up and ignore this. It's obvious that there's not going to be an agreement on it, so let's drop it until there's an actual GLEP written on it. At that point, you can argue the points of the GLEP and it won't just be useless flaming. Either that, or you can take your stand and join up to form an x86 arch team and just end the need for this discussion right now. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-z5lJyWo2i+sRrcKHXkbt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDF1aNkT4lNIS36YERAgAyAKCFduyVUONuWzMu5oUKNZV8MzZm4gCeLNpp tUmQz5BYgyUA8roTXDIhazw= =OI5D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-z5lJyWo2i+sRrcKHXkbt-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list