From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EADV4-0002gm-3K for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:18:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7ULFhke030271; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:15:43 GMT Received: from mail.max-t.com (h216-18-124-229.gtcust.grouptelecom.net [216.18.124.229]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7ULE2Lw008129 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:14:03 GMT Received: from cocagne.max-t.internal ([192.168.1.124]) by mail.max-t.com with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1EADSi-00084w-Fd for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:16:10 -0400 From: Olivier Crete To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20050830215649.240a3bc5@snowdrop.home> References: <20050825000442.GC1701@nightcrawler> <431036EA.8050401@gentoo.org> <20050827100130.GX1701@nightcrawler> <1125334595.1964.107.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050829203259.GA13987@nightcrawler> <1125351816.1964.148.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050829231247.104e9ff8@snowdrop.home> <1125404657.1964.167.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <4314715E.5000809@gentoo.org> <4314BA18.8040009@egr.msu.edu> <1125436518.15621.54.camel@darksystem> <20050830214002.1ce72cc2@localhost> <1125434724.3539.42.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> <20050830215649.240a3bc5@snowdrop.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Organization: Gentoo Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:16:09 -0400 Message-Id: <1125436569.3539.48.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.124 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tester@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on mx.max-t.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1+cvs (built Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:35:17 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.max-t.com) X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j7ULE2Lw008129 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id j7ULFhmC030271 X-Archives-Salt: 2cbd123f-d66a-4395-acd6-62f24b13c216 X-Archives-Hash: 2bd5641aeafae06206c08235dd879ff9 On Tue, 2005-30-08 at 21:56 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:45:24 -0400 Olivier Crete > wrote: > | And I dont think the QA is worst on x86.. Most herd devs are on x86 > | and its their responsability to do their QA. >=20 > QA needs coordination. Otherwise we end up with repeats of the "Gnome > not building on stable x86 for several weeks at a time because the > Gnome and Mozilla herds don't talk to each other" fiasco. I could not agree more. Do you want to do the coordination ? > | And x86 has many more packages that any other architecture. >=20 > Careful with that... The difference is not so big as you might think, > and when you consider how many people own, say, sparc and compare it > with how many own x86, you might be surprised... Well, I would not be surprised at the number of packages that are not use by anyone on sparc or mips or even amd64. But that might have a few x86 users..=20 --=20 Olivier Cr=C3=AAte tester@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer x86 Security Liaison --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list