From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EA876-0007L2-B2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:33:28 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7UFThko022277; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:29:43 GMT Received: from mail.max-t.com (h216-18-124-229.gtcust.grouptelecom.net [216.18.124.229]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7UFOiiT012693 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:24:44 GMT Received: from cocagne.max-t.internal ([192.168.1.124]) by mail.max-t.com with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1EA80e-0004fU-4n for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:26:50 -0400 From: Olivier Crete To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4314715E.5000809@gentoo.org> References: <20050825000442.GC1701@nightcrawler> <431036EA.8050401@gentoo.org> <20050827100130.GX1701@nightcrawler> <1125334595.1964.107.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050829203259.GA13987@nightcrawler> <1125351816.1964.148.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050829231247.104e9ff8@snowdrop.home> <1125404657.1964.167.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <4314715E.5000809@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Organization: Gentoo Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:26:48 -0400 Message-Id: <1125415608.3539.28.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.124 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tester@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on mx.max-t.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1+cvs (built Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:35:17 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.max-t.com) X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j7UFOiiT012693 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id j7UFThmM022277 X-Archives-Salt: a7e22807-6993-40a2-9b2d-df45440b8b86 X-Archives-Hash: 02e9d901128b547a1e731c2fdf08850b On Tue, 2005-30-08 at 10:46 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote: > >>Shouldn't this fall under the x86 arch team rather than releng? The > >=20 > > I'm sorry, but *what* x86 arch team? >=20 > That's the point. Ciaran is just pointing out for the gazillionth time= =20 > that x86 is an unsupported arch, if you go by the standards the other=20 > arches have to follow to be part of Gentoo. When is this going to be=20 > fixed? Or, will it just be ignored until all the x86 folks get amd64=20 > machines and x86 pretty much becomes irrelevant? Stop being jealous and get a Dell dude. --=20 Olivier Cr=C3=AAte tester@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer x86 Security Liaison --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list