From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EA5Dq-0005li-BR
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:28:14 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7UCPAQm008272;
	Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:25:10 GMT
Received: from smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7UCMR0E013161
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:22:28 GMT
Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4])
	by smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j7UCPHQ1003885
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:25:18 -0400
Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:24:18 -0400
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles
From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <20050829231247.104e9ff8@snowdrop.home>
References: <20050825000442.GC1701@nightcrawler>
	 <431036EA.8050401@gentoo.org> <20050827100130.GX1701@nightcrawler>
	 <1125334595.1964.107.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>
	 <20050829203259.GA13987@nightcrawler>
	 <1125351816.1964.148.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>
	 <20050829231247.104e9ff8@snowdrop.home>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Om79L2Ta6tTZyGQCPqYf"
Organization: Gentoo Linux
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:24:17 -0400
Message-Id: <1125404657.1964.167.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 
X-Archives-Salt: bcbc459a-5dfb-436e-8436-ee9b00d2d70a
X-Archives-Hash: 05dd4d5fb9a88501b8eaa30596afbd5b


--=-Om79L2Ta6tTZyGQCPqYf
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 23:12 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:43:35 -0400 Chris Gianelloni
> <wolf31o2@gentoo.org> wrote:
> | There's nothing stopping you from creating a
> | default-linux/x86/ferringb profile and doing whatever you wish in it,
> | but editing default-linux/x86/2005.1 without speaking with releng
> | would be considered taboo.
>=20
> Shouldn't this fall under the x86 arch team rather than releng? The

I'm sorry, but *what* x86 arch team?

> arch teams maintain the other profiles, and whilst the arch's releng
> contact will certainly be doing some of the changes, so will other arch
> team members who do not get deeply involved in the release process...

Nothing is stopping them from making changes.  At the same time, I bet
they also talk with their releng contact when they make the changes to
make sure it won't completely hose something up.

--=20
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

--=-Om79L2Ta6tTZyGQCPqYf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDFE/xkT4lNIS36YERAlhhAJ9PjJB5fo1DIhuJXyBDQsLE8FjU4ACgxcCr
Pen6M9YkFwT8uqMYVNzVzcE=
=7C72
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-Om79L2Ta6tTZyGQCPqYf--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list