From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E57KI-0007yO-O4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:42:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7GJeaaO028282; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:40:36 GMT Received: from smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7GJbhwa032295 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:37:43 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j7GJdtku020508 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:39:55 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:38:09 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect modules From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <43023CC6.1050206@gentoo.org> References: <42AD8D53.1080100@gentoo.org> <1124219235.19895.27.camel@cloud.outersquare.org> <43023CC6.1050206@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gxCt4jra3XjnFFtszKBh" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:38:08 -0400 Message-Id: <1124221089.21223.87.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Archives-Salt: b7dfd8b8-67c1-4169-91a9-35423a349271 X-Archives-Hash: 544d3344d99107fc97ae9fc9f76d378d --=-gxCt4jra3XjnFFtszKBh Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 12:21 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > | The eselect developers want to keep all eselect modules in their svn > | repository and distributed through a single package (app-admin/eselect)= . > | Their main reasons for this are better QA and less overhead for release= s > | and merging. >=20 > And unnecessarily tying releases together of things that have no reason > to be tied together. >=20 > It's fine to keep all the source in the same repository, but don't lock > releases of unrelated modules together. That's the same thing X went > through and has finally learned with the modularization effort. There's also the size issue. I use opengl-update on the LiveCD builds, and have exactly zero need for *any* other eselect module, so why should I be required to have them all to just get the one that I need? --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-gxCt4jra3XjnFFtszKBh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDAkCgkT4lNIS36YERAgeqAJ9VE+jtyz97TNJYDo0I2OI3xW5RdQCgotZp XEjBcLn5toPT7scv2klngkc= =0aej -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-gxCt4jra3XjnFFtszKBh-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list