From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DuzMb-0004o7-Il for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 21:10:54 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6JL9ZGm007606; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 21:09:35 GMT Received: from smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6JL7i0t006009 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 21:07:44 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j6JL8pRB000414 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 17:08:51 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 19 Jul 2005 17:07:39 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] init script guidelines From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20050719164348.549145ab@nomad.datanode.net> References: <16CC9569DA3E4D41A1D4BC25D7B5A16A473AC6@hercules.magbank.com> <1121798402.26224.14.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050719164348.549145ab@nomad.datanode.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-pFuUATTfdIUwq3T7pS9R" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 17:07:38 -0400 Message-Id: <1121807259.26224.35.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Archives-Salt: e33522ca-0755-4027-9e6e-e81e786ce4f4 X-Archives-Hash: fb64c21f6d93d025567db0c2db952e96 --=-pFuUATTfdIUwq3T7pS9R Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 16:43 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote: > not to detract from the discussion, but...anyone else notice this? He quoted me. His text was above mine. People have met me. They know I exist. Though Eric might be a figment of my shattered subconscious psyche. Who knows? :P > On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:40:01 -0400 > Chris Gianelloni wrote: >=20 > > They shouldn't, but that doesn't mean implementing some half-baked > > hack to resolve the situation. It might be better to instead patch > > the daemon in question and send the patches upstream. Upstream > > developers (usually) are much more willing to make changes when you've > > done the work for them... ;] > >=20 >=20 > On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:39:16 -0400 > "Eric Brown" wrote: > >=20 > > They shouldn't, but that doesn't mean implementing some half-baked > > hack to resolve the situation. It might be better to instead patch > > the daemon in question and send the patches upstream. Upstream > > developers (usually) are much more willing to make changes when you've > > done the work for them... ;] > >=20 >=20 > I'm beginning to suspect Eric and Chris are the same person. Prove they > aren't - show evidence of them independently in the same room at the > same time ;) >=20 > (and being a mid-stream developer, I know *I* like working patches more > than 'fix your junk, it broke' reports) --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-pFuUATTfdIUwq3T7pS9R Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBC3WuakT4lNIS36YERAjUqAKC1K3KHUtiV0A5SB1o/LTCoVMrYAQCeNMlI BwOyiSHNb6MRHt/LSOadR5s= =yKU8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-pFuUATTfdIUwq3T7pS9R-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list