From: Kristian Benoit <kbenoit@opersys.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-embedded] Interactive command
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 12:51:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1121359894.5971.98.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42D68C5B.1000005@gentoo.org>
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 12:01 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
> Not sure of the mechanics on how
> this is done for the portage emerge process, but even stopping the
> emerge process for those packages that *must* have a preconfig done
> would help (are there any though? I can think of one maybe, but not
> really anything to demand new functionality in portage yet).
This problem is mostly present in the embedded world. As the packages
have to be fine tuned (as a kernel is) at compiled time for the system
on which it is beiing build. For example, uClibc and busybox uses a
kernel like config.
As described on busybox's home page:
"BusyBox combines tiny versions of many common UNIX utilities into a
single small executable. It provides replacements for most of the
utilities you usually find in GNU fileutils, shellutils, etc. The
utilities in BusyBox generally have fewer options than their
full-featured GNU cousins; however, the options that are included
provide the expected functionality and behave very much like their GNU
counterparts. BusyBox provides a fairly complete environment for any
small or embedded system."
With so many applications/options provided by a single package, that aim
to go in small memory/storage system, one must understand that users
must fine tune it.
Kristian
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-14 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-13 22:44 [gentoo-dev] Interactive command Kristian Benoit
2005-07-13 23:49 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-07-14 14:45 ` Kristian Benoit
2005-07-14 0:02 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-embedded] " Ned Ludd
2005-07-14 5:13 ` Kristian Benoit
2005-07-14 6:43 ` Patrick Lauer
2005-07-14 14:37 ` Kristian Benoit
2005-07-14 11:58 ` Ned Ludd
2005-07-14 12:37 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-07-14 14:56 ` Kristian Benoit
2005-07-16 9:20 ` Drake Wyrm
2005-08-23 13:41 ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-08-23 15:12 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-08-25 11:23 ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-07-14 14:29 ` Kristian Benoit
2005-07-14 16:01 ` Michael Cummings
2005-07-14 16:51 ` Kristian Benoit [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1121359894.5971.98.camel@localhost \
--to=kbenoit@opersys.com \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox