Re: [gentoo-dev] devfs is dead, let's move on

[Martin Schlemmer <azarah@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2206 bytes --]

On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 18:08 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 11 July 2005 03:47 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 20:34 +0200, Richard Fish wrote:
> > > >>>I.o.w. is it still necessary to have RC_DEVICE_TARBALL="yes" as a
> > > >>>default or can we move to a pure udev system and change the default to
> > > >>>"no".
> > > >>
> > > >>I've been running my boxes successfully with "no" since the option
> > > >>showed up just fine :)
> > > >
> > > >I think people is under a misconception about this option and ... you
> > > >really only need to enable this for a driver that is not sysfs aware
> > > >(nvidia comes to mind - any others?), or if you have some custom nodes
> > > >in /dev that you cannot do via udev ...  And I am pretty sure (correct
> > > >me if I am wrong) that all (or most?) in-kernel drivers are sysfs aware,
> > > >and only a handful outside are not.
> > >
> > > Well, I do have a small issue with the software RAID (md) driver, in
> > > that when autodetection is not performed by the driver (due to either
> > > being a module or booting the system through an initramfs), no sysfs
> > > entries or device nodes are created.
> > >
> > > Normally my RAID system is brought up inside my initramfs with static
> > > nodes, so this really only affects my recovery CD, where I need to run:
> > >
> > >     for d in 0 1 2 3; do
> > >         /sbin/mdadm --assemble --config=partitions --auto=md
> > > --super-minor=$d /dev/md$d >/dev/null 2>&1
> > >     done
> > >
> > > Maybe something similar will be required in /sbin/rc, like you currently
> > > do for LVM and the device mapper?  It isn't a critical problem
> > > though...I am pretty sure there are only a few Gentoo users who will
> > > ever see this...maybe as few as 1!!!
> >
> > Mike, what do you think?  This viable?  We could maybe add an init addon
> > for md, and move the lvm/whatever stuff to that as well?
> 
> i dont see the point ... ive already fixed raidtools / mdadm to generate 
> device nodes before running since udev doesnt do it correctly/at all

Ok, great .. just wanted to check ... Guess that is still in ~ ?


-- 
Martin Schlemmer



[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]