From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DqacO-00084G-CO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:57:00 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j67Hu1WI015251; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 17:56:01 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j67Hq87G005906 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 17:52:08 GMT Received: from c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([67.171.150.177] helo=supernova.lan.local) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DqaXe-0003Oq-R7 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:52:07 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EBUILD_FORMAT support From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1120738789.1972.0.camel@localhost> References: <20050707002002.GH20687@lightning.stealer.net> <42CC7EFB.2020308@ieee.org> <88F6D0D3-99A2-4C37-A233-D34EFB1EE5F3@gentoo.org> <200507070047.35274.vapier@gentoo.org> <1120738789.1972.0.camel@localhost> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-t1YUu9Uri9+ltCw9uQ3U" Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 10:52:06 -0700 Message-Id: <1120758726.18019.6.camel@supernova.lan.local> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 X-Archives-Salt: 6280c63b-a621-4f84-81e1-f986d31614b0 X-Archives-Hash: 54e28fc7804ef66cceaffa321e099e51 --=-t1YUu9Uri9+ltCw9uQ3U Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 08:19 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: > I would be in favor of EAPI=3D or an even shorter variable name. >=20 > strlen(EBUILD_FORMAT) * 19546 =3D 249K > strlen(EAPI) * 19546 =3D 77K > strlen(EV) * 19546 =3D 39K >=20 > Where 19546 is the number if ebuilds in the tree as. So, the size of the tree is 500216K. This makes the percent increase in size for the options above 0.0005%, 0.0002% and 0.0001% respectively. In any case, nearly irrelevant to its present size. Thanks, Donnie --=-t1YUu9Uri9+ltCw9uQ3U Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCzWvGXVaO67S1rtsRAiDuAKDrpkPmV4PHv2Pa01iQ0NYHmFeETwCgxvXb Z7iIbZuEWGLKd3s0//99Mvk= =vs/9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-t1YUu9Uri9+ltCw9uQ3U-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list