From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DppRj-0000Md-6x for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 15:34:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j65FXWVw026745; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 15:33:32 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j65FVrUw027994 for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 15:31:54 GMT Received: from 83.72.54.193.ip.tele2adsl.dk ([83.72.54.193] helo=[192.168.1.115]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DppPW-0004Oa-J8 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 15:32:34 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New virtual: virtual/pcmcia From: Henrik Brix Andersen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1120131329.32013.8.camel@localhost> References: <1120036736.12818.11.camel@sponge.fungus> <1120124920.12807.14.camel@sponge.fungus> <1120131329.32013.8.camel@localhost> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-lQKrazjwsQOUJMk5+EOK" Organization: Gentoo Metadistribution Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:32:20 +0200 Message-Id: <1120577541.14149.3.camel@sponge.fungus> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 X-Archives-Salt: 313d8332-7e77-488d-b09a-e1c42f93c087 X-Archives-Hash: 60a9aa4b1586fa94046861c70daafa3b --=-lQKrazjwsQOUJMk5+EOK Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 07:35 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: > On that note.. Would you mind compiling it one time with a gcc built=20 > with +boundschecking and then enabling CFLAGS+=3D -fbounds-checking as a > basic q/a check. Reason being that if nobody has ever included it > anywhere the chances of it being audited are slim to none and > -fbounds-checking helps ferret out alot of common coding mistakes. > gcc-3.4.4 works good for this. I've tested this with CFLAGS+=3D-fbounds-checking as suggested, and I see a couple of "cc1: warning: htb stub: bounds checking is not supported" warnings. Please advice. ./Brix --=20 Henrik Brix Andersen Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd --=-lQKrazjwsQOUJMk5+EOK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCyqgEv+Q4flTiePgRAnHoAJ9OvNnsZZ7kXdHx46cR6bWTZAzz7QCeKQXa ssLFSpXepTyzj7IV67spn6Y= =p9ah -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-lQKrazjwsQOUJMk5+EOK-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list