From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 38: Status of forum moderators in the Gentoo project
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:29:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1119968965.13606.186.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea440b1d050628033568832d65@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1974 bytes --]
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 12:35 +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
> > Can anybody explain me the difference between them ?
>
> Well, you better discuss that with your fellow developers. It was they
> who didn't want us to become developers and gave us the title of staff
> instead.
You really don't give up on these semantics, do you?
All of our infrastructure "developers" whom have not taken the ebuild
quiz are actually "staff". The *only* distinction between the two is
CVS access. Please quit trying to make this out to be some form of "us
versus them" argument when there is none. If *any* of the moderators,
or even forums members, were to take the ebuild quiz and follow the
recruitment process, then they would become "developers" for Gentoo. It
is as simple as that.
> > > Didn't I say that was already agreed with devrel?
> >
> > Do I have to quit saying that I think that's wrong? No thanks. You are
> > the only group that will make new devs apart from devrel.
>
> You are obviously free to state your opinion. But this *maybe* is not
> to be discussed with us.
Discussed with you that you need to follow the same rules as all of the
other Gentoo members?
> If you didn't notice, as Christian already state before, we ARE
> official, we are NOT joining you. We are simply getting our DESERVED
> recognition.
Really? Where is your account on toucan? How about your name on the
roll call?
I don't mean to sound rude, but while you have always been a part of
Gentoo, youw ere not official, otherwise we would not be having this
conversation, at all.
> IMHO that argument is more than enough.
However, it is not to some of us. Perhaps rather than taking such a
stubborn, argumentative stance, you would give positive examples or
arguments with some merit?
At this point, you wouldn't have my vote.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-28 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-28 8:39 [gentoo-dev] GLEP 38: Status of forum moderators in the Gentoo project christian.hartmann
2005-06-28 9:03 ` Fernando J. Pereda
2005-06-28 9:53 ` Ioannis Aslanidis
2005-06-28 9:59 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-06-28 10:04 ` Ioannis Aslanidis
2005-06-28 10:15 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-06-28 10:48 ` Shyam Mani
2005-06-28 14:17 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-06-28 10:06 ` Fernando J. Pereda
2005-06-28 10:19 ` Ioannis Aslanidis
2005-06-28 10:28 ` Fernando J. Pereda
2005-06-28 10:35 ` Ioannis Aslanidis
2005-06-28 10:51 ` Shyam Mani
2005-06-28 10:57 ` Ioannis Aslanidis
2005-06-28 11:01 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-06-28 11:05 ` Shyam Mani
2005-06-28 11:10 ` Simon Stelling
2005-06-28 11:20 ` Jon Portnoy
2005-06-28 21:49 ` Olivier Crete
2005-06-28 21:58 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-06-28 22:11 ` Christian Hartmann
2005-06-28 22:03 ` John Mylchreest
2005-06-28 22:20 ` Christian Hartmann
2005-06-28 22:34 ` Lance Albertson
2005-06-28 23:14 ` Lance Albertson
2005-06-29 0:45 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2005-06-29 6:55 ` Andrea Barisani
2005-06-29 14:09 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-06-29 1:32 ` [gentoo-dev] " Lars Weiler
2005-06-29 2:35 ` Lance Albertson
2005-06-28 23:24 ` Marius Mauch
2005-06-28 14:34 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-06-28 17:06 ` Haas Wernfried
2005-06-28 10:54 ` Jon Portnoy
2005-06-28 11:01 ` Ioannis Aslanidis
2005-06-28 11:13 ` Fernando J. Pereda
2005-06-28 11:13 ` Shyam Mani
2005-06-28 11:20 ` Jon Portnoy
2005-06-28 14:29 ` Chris Gianelloni [this message]
2005-06-28 14:38 ` Ioannis Aslanidis
2005-06-28 10:48 ` Jon Portnoy
2005-06-28 10:56 ` Ioannis Aslanidis
2005-06-28 11:00 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-06-28 11:19 ` Jon Portnoy
2005-06-28 11:23 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-06-28 11:06 ` Jon Portnoy
2005-06-28 14:22 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-06-28 14:16 ` Chris Gianelloni
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-28 12:00 christian.hartmann
2005-06-27 21:22 Michael Curtis Napier
2005-06-27 21:32 ` Sven Vermeulen
2005-06-27 22:14 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-06-27 17:09 Haas Wernfried
2005-06-27 19:47 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-06-27 20:31 ` Fernando J. Pereda
2005-06-27 20:50 ` Haas Wernfried
2005-06-27 21:07 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-06-27 21:20 ` Haas Wernfried
2005-06-27 21:32 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-06-27 21:25 ` Fernando J. Pereda
2005-06-27 21:50 ` Ioannis Aslanidis
2005-06-27 22:19 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-06-27 21:19 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-06-27 21:55 ` Haas Wernfried
2005-06-27 22:00 ` Ioannis Aslanidis
2005-06-27 22:24 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-06-28 6:44 ` Ioannis Aslanidis
2005-06-28 7:03 ` Michael Tindal
2005-06-28 14:11 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-06-28 8:57 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-06-28 9:39 ` Marius Mauch
2005-06-28 10:37 ` Anders Hellgren
2005-06-28 10:44 ` Ioannis Aslanidis
2005-06-28 11:21 ` Allen Parker
2005-06-28 11:33 ` Jon Portnoy
2005-06-28 11:51 ` Allen Parker
2005-06-28 12:01 ` Ioannis Aslanidis
2005-06-28 10:55 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-06-28 11:29 ` Anders Hellgren
2005-06-28 11:46 ` Ioannis Aslanidis
2005-06-28 11:50 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-06-28 12:31 ` Anders Hellgren
2005-06-28 11:06 ` Simon Stelling
2005-06-28 11:12 ` Marius Mauch
2005-06-28 16:39 ` Ricardo Loureiro
2005-06-28 16:47 ` twofourtysix
2005-06-28 16:57 ` Ricardo Loureiro
2005-06-28 16:58 ` Ioannis Aslanidis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1119968965.13606.186.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net \
--to=wolf31o2@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox