From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.105.134.102] (helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DkOTi-0004h4-6b for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:46:26 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j5KFjb6r002290; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:45:37 GMT Received: from smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5KFhwNe026796 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:43:59 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j5KFiTEc029519 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:44:29 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:44:06 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] linux-2.6.12 From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <42B422E6.2090602@gentoo.org> References: <42B3A17D.6090306@leetworks.com> <200506180050.13233.vapier@gentoo.org> <42B3A8A7.9060508@leetworks.com> <20050617230517.0e976362@enterprise.weeve.org> <42B3B94E.70204@gentoo.org> <42B3B965.1030804@leetworks.com> <42B3BEAE.40608@gentoo.org> <42B3F713.1000108@gentoo.org> <42B422E6.2090602@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-6KP4O5dmRkth1rLgk4Z+" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:44:05 -0400 Message-Id: <1119282246.13606.29.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 X-Archives-Salt: bc6adfd6-e3c9-45a4-a4dc-f0632b0b296d X-Archives-Hash: 44b3d6a0ef1b3872d787c968d7f22b3e --=-6KP4O5dmRkth1rLgk4Z+ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 09:34 -0400, Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote: > That said, we're not RedHat. We ship as MANY features as we can and let > the user decide. I agree that it is valuable to get reiser4 testing done > up front. Eventually - some people will use it. Last I checked "I think > $FOO is stupid" wasn't a valid closure code in bugzilla ;-) It absolutely is for releases... ;] We only allow things onto the releases that has been deemed stable simply because we do not want to deal with the bug reports, especially considering our new 6-month release cycle. We're actually a little conservative on what we allow onto the release media because of this. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-6KP4O5dmRkth1rLgk4Z+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCtuRFkT4lNIS36YERArbuAJ4o9dmlLJSuOdaljzDwAjsAONnjQwCguER+ cf7r0rsvJjkwdZXqVtPDFV4= =0/NR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-6KP4O5dmRkth1rLgk4Z+-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list