public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roy Marples <uberlord@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New GLEP draft: Status of forum moderators in the Gentoo project
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 02:15:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1119057322.7902.30.camel@uberpc.ubernet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42B319FC.6060706@email.de>

On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 20:44 +0200, Christian Hartmann wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> as some of you might already know we are working on a GLEP that is about
> the status of forums moderators and admins in the gentoo project. The
> main goal of the GLEP is to create a kind of quality assurance and to
> ensure that upcoming moderators know about the forums guidelines.
> Furthermore it should improve the information flow and improve the
> relation between forums and all the other projects.

As an ex site/forum admin (non Gentoo) I really have to ask what kind of
"quality assurance" you're dealing with here.

Are we talking profane language or just about moving a post of "how do I
install do xyz" to the right forum?

And I do have to ask - what information flow? At the most, Gentoo devs
read the forum and post there. After that, forum users have to contact
devs via IRC or b.g.o - at best both parties have to read the forums or
use IRC, at present people post bugs to get attention. I fail to see how
forums can improve the "information flow" when a vast proportion of devs
don't even read the forums. I do, but after a year and a bit of being on
the forums I think I can safely say that most devs involved with
networking don't post in the network forum or read it.

> 
> I'm now sending this to you for further discussion. It has already been
> discussed with all moderators and site admins as well as with devrel and
> the glep guys. Devrel now agreed on the terms and conditions described
> in the GLEP considering the process of aquiring new moderators as
> developers.
> 
> The newest revision of the GLEP can always be found here:
> http://download.iansview.com/gentoo/docs/glep-38/glep-0038.txt

After reading that, I get the impression that forum admins/mods want
better recognition within the Gentoo realm. I would argue that they are
the most visible to start with. Heck, I first checked out the forums,
downloaded the CD, tried it out, discovered that wireless networking
sucked and the rest as they say is history.

Maybe I'm getting old or summat, but isn't this more of a "Here's how we
want to recruit for the forums mods" proposal rather than a "Gentoo
Linux Enhancement Proposal"?

> 
> Feedback is highly appreciated.

Cool - here's the feedback in a nutshell.
Thumbs up aside from once thing - why the need for a GLEP?

Roy

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-06-18  1:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-17 18:44 [gentoo-dev] New GLEP draft: Status of forum moderators in the Gentoo project Christian Hartmann
2005-06-17 20:24 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-06-17 20:27   ` Jonathan Smith
2005-06-17 21:13     ` Haas Wernfried
2005-06-17 20:29 ` Rob Cakebread
2005-06-17 21:38   ` Haas Wernfried
2005-06-17 22:40     ` Rob Cakebread
2005-06-18  1:15 ` Roy Marples [this message]
2005-06-18  8:32   ` Haas Wernfried

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1119057322.7902.30.camel@uberpc.ubernet \
    --to=uberlord@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox