From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.105.134.102] (helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiwLm-0006DJ-C1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:32:14 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j5GFUZgV021376; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:30:35 GMT Received: from smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5GFS5wF017951 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:28:05 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j5GFTKkx021334 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:29:20 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:28:32 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual - xlocker? From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <42B1943E.6030604@gentoo.org> References: <42B192CC.6090001@gentoo.org> <42B1943E.6030604@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Dw1tcNaoE+OHKVO2z9Gf" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:28:31 -0400 Message-Id: <1118935712.14164.58.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 X-Archives-Salt: 7777bcd5-5ee1-4f82-947c-0722e401277d X-Archives-Hash: 33f931411ed549392454ddc49e3634d6 --=-Dw1tcNaoE+OHKVO2z9Gf Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 18:01 +0300, Alin Dobre wrote: > Jonathan Smith wrote: > > The desktop-misc herd (which was sadly neglected until recently) could > > benefit from a new virtual. x11-misc/xautolock is a wrapper which locks > > the screen via any appropriate program such as xlockmore or xtrlock. >=20 > xscreensaver locks the screen, too, besides its normal screensaver > features (like xlockmore). >=20 > > This program needs to depend on an xlocker, but we should not lock user= s > > into one specific one. > >=20 > > See bug 95246 [1] > >=20 > > I would probably name it virtual/xlocker, but other suggestions are, of > > course, welcome. > >=20 > > Thanks > >=20 > > [1]: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95246 > >=20 You don't have to setup a virtual for this. In fact, the simpler method (especially when dealing with only one package) is to use the || *DEPEND syntax. RDEPEND=3D"|| ( x11-misc/xscreensaver x11-misc/xlockmore x11-misc/xtrlock )" This would prefer xscreensaver over the others, but any would satisfy the dependency. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-Dw1tcNaoE+OHKVO2z9Gf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCsZqfkT4lNIS36YERAmeZAJ4pgBKsq0L1Hr/+8s14HGqrTMCSnwCfeTjG AjicElAIN899McDNA2taOpo= =tfPj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Dw1tcNaoE+OHKVO2z9Gf-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list