From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.105.134.102] (helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DimBZ-0002jy-83 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 04:41:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j5G4dPdY013973; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 04:39:25 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5G4bj06001881 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 04:37:45 GMT Received: from ip68-102-196-182.ks.ok.cox.net ([68.102.196.182] helo=pursuit) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1Dim9J-0006zN-0v for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 04:38:41 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Final proposal: New alias maintainer-needed@g.o or some such (speak now or forever hold your peace ;) ) From: Lance Albertson To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20050615184950.GO5946@kfk4ever.com> References: <1118630128.32687.14.camel@powerix.local.c0ffeine.de> <42ADE358.3020602@gentoo.org> <1118699925.9459.3.camel@mirage.ramereth.lan> <200506140038.21821.pYrania@gentoo.org> <20050615184950.GO5946@kfk4ever.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mvHlSeGyVu99uSS5dfy8" Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 23:38:51 -0500 Message-Id: <1118896731.29180.8.camel@pursuit> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 X-Archives-Salt: e8751610-552f-4da3-9c9c-8ec57c3da6da X-Archives-Hash: 396bd0cd98ef3cd4524701ed195aae33 --=-mvHlSeGyVu99uSS5dfy8 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 20:49 +0200, Maurice van der Pot wrote: > So I take it everybody who replied on this thread is in agreement that > the creation of an alias (e.g. maintainer-needed@gentoo.org) would be > the best solution and that it is upto the herd to choose between > assigning the bug to the new alias and putting the herd on the cc and > the other way around? >=20 > If this is introduced we need to record it somewhere. I'm not sure what > would be the best place though. I'll be more than happy to mv new-ebuilds maintainer-needed if seemant likes the idea. Seems like the two should fit together fine. Let me find seemant and see what he thinks since he's kind of in charge of bug-wrangler stuff. --=20 Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --=-mvHlSeGyVu99uSS5dfy8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCsQJbQW+hXSf0t0IRAnwvAKChp9vnKSzOJaE7lrb6IrQYd8rxlQCeLmGB DQIL8FZUbvR0XFP9yAnfGv0= =Zwl0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-mvHlSeGyVu99uSS5dfy8-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list