From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.105.134.102] (helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiZjV-0002Di-TA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:23:14 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j5FFLjWJ019378; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:21:45 GMT Received: from smtp03.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5FFK34i014609 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:20:03 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp03.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j5FFL5Lb015970 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:21:05 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:20:23 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] perl/openssl circular dep, possible solution (python/perl/db devs please read) From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200506151034.45386.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <20050613171829.GA25427@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <200506141748.50705.vapier@gentoo.org> <1118843102.14164.13.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <200506151034.45386.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-W2UD+nTkb2fNRh8t9ZdM" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:20:23 -0400 Message-Id: <1118848823.14164.25.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 X-Archives-Salt: eca8d66c-52e4-49a2-8e96-9568d7a065d1 X-Archives-Hash: b9f96d6fa40b219f8e1e812b9a73cd2b --=-W2UD+nTkb2fNRh8t9ZdM Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 10:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 15 June 2005 09:45 am, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 17:48 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Tuesday 14 June 2005 05:32 pm, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > > > > I don't think gcc-config should depend on portage at all. Or does i= t > > > > actually use portage services. In any case it should be an RDEPEND,= as > > > > building does not depend on portage being there. > > > > > > it was added when `portageq` didnt exist everywhere so we had to make > > > sure the portage on the system ran a new-enough version > > > > > > we can drop it now if it'll break this circular DEPEND > > > > Please do. >=20 > notice the 'if it breaks the circle' ;) >=20 > can someone confirm that ? I just created a new snapshot with this change made, so I'll let you know. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-W2UD+nTkb2fNRh8t9ZdM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCsEc2kT4lNIS36YERAg0TAKCP4PIh2j6nK+IZZdRBj6GATxxxfgCaAs5J hl7xUxDVtnk239kXFYDaU8w= =S+zH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-W2UD+nTkb2fNRh8t9ZdM-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list