From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.105.134.102] (helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiYH2-0007fm-Jv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:49:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j5FDliwx009563; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:47:44 GMT Received: from smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5FDiiVF007175 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:44:44 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j5FDjnWH009914 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 09:45:50 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 15 Jun 2005 09:45:02 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] perl/openssl circular dep, possible solution (python/perl/db devs please read) From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200506141748.50705.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <20050613171829.GA25427@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <20050614211556.GA6656@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <200506142332.15057.pauldv@gentoo.org> <200506141748.50705.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-G3J3S5TtY2mBkYclQg7W" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 09:45:02 -0400 Message-Id: <1118843102.14164.13.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 X-Archives-Salt: ea13bfef-b4dd-4365-863c-8abc026f9613 X-Archives-Hash: 864dc7254e8c9e40cfe93909f2b5cc5a --=-G3J3S5TtY2mBkYclQg7W Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 17:48 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 14 June 2005 05:32 pm, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > > I don't think gcc-config should depend on portage at all. Or does it > > actually use portage services. In any case it should be an RDEPEND, as > > building does not depend on portage being there. >=20 > it was added when `portageq` didnt exist everywhere so we had to make sur= e the=20 > portage on the system ran a new-enough version >=20 > we can drop it now if it'll break this circular DEPEND Please do. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-G3J3S5TtY2mBkYclQg7W Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCsDDekT4lNIS36YERAocRAJ40HyYLN7tVDfHhWYh+9TgPqI+jKQCeOJDW qk3Z9eOZl1Xm2nJmFLkdNfU= =F18e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-G3J3S5TtY2mBkYclQg7W-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list