From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp03.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j58DFemQ029620 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:15:40 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp03.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j58DGRf1031389 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:16:28 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:15:50 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ekeyword and ordering From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: <20050606222623.GI9084@kaf.zko.hp.com> <200506072232.36536.cryos@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-o/9ym+nN//HIm7j0jArv" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 09:15:50 -0400 Message-Id: <1118236550.19008.32.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 X-Archives-Salt: eee5790f-eb7b-49f7-be81-c118712b8c8c X-Archives-Hash: 8baeb6536cf7dcc7bcccd0678f6105ba --=-o/9ym+nN//HIm7j0jArv Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 23:07 +0000, Ferris McCormick wrote: > I also like alpha, but that is not what I am responding to. And I have t= o=20 > admit that I haven't followed this too closely. But the "if one arch=20 > stabalises..." assumption can be misleading. For example, xorg-x11=20 > maintainer arch is x86 (spyderous will correct me if I am wrong), but I=20 > know of at least once instance in which sparc (and a few other archs) wer= e=20 > stable ahead of x86. >=20 > Granted, spyderous knew what was going on and why, but for a few days=20 > there, the "stabilises" rule of thumb with nothing more would have led th= e=20 > unsuspecting reader to believe that maintainer arch for xorg was sparc. No, because spyderous didn't do it. It should also be noted in the ChangeLog: "Marking stable on sparc because of $blah, which needs to be addressed quickly... got the OK from spyderous..." Something like that... --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-o/9ym+nN//HIm7j0jArv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCpu+GkT4lNIS36YERAiMyAKDB3adtKIn+0tj+xTeUb6KuScDwaQCguR2R rXQdK5adsi2QD8JhigG/qYQ= =57+D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-o/9ym+nN//HIm7j0jArv-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list