public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Corey Shields <cshields@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] where goes Gentoo?
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 09:23:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1118161426.7467.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050607150858.GO9084@kaf.zko.hp.com>

On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 11:08 -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
> Ah, sorry, that isn't quite what I meant.  Rather I intended to point
> out that we should not be deluded into thinking that the changes
> required for Gentoo to be enterprise-ready are small.  Some of the
> changes are surmountable, but each one could appear to necessitate,
> IMHO, a change at the core of Gentoo development.  I would prefer for
> the solutions to be possible more transparently.

Yeah, the changes that do need to be made are not small I agree.  I do
feel that for the most part they could be made without disrupting the
core of Gentoo.  For example, there is no need to put a freeze on the
whole tree in the name of "enterprise stability" and screw everyone else
wanting bleeding edge packages, when you could snapshot the tree (like
you mention below)

> For example, one way a company could presently deploy Gentoo
<snip>
> In other words, a company can implement a Gentoo product lifecycle
> as a wrapper around the existing Gentoo development process.  It is
> a lot of work for the company, and they'd better hire some bright
> sysadmins, but it would be possible.
> 
> If there is an enterprise subproject formed in Gentoo, I'd like to see
> their methods be similar.  Develop tools that make it easier to manage
> and maintain an enterprise deployment, without changing how Gentoo is
> currently developed.  Without hoisting new expectations on the Gentoo
> developers, release process, etc.

GLEP 19 is pretty much right along these lines, and already has some
prototype/testing going on.   :)

> I did not intend "hobbyist" to be disparaging.  I think that the big
> companies (including HP, who has also donated tens of thousands of
> dollars of equipment btw) see a lot of potential in Gentoo.

Cool.  I probably put too much personal feeling behind it.  I don't
trust corporate distros anymore.  I was in a situation where we got
royally screwed by RedHat, tried to work out a deal with them, and had
no luck.  For us we got stuck in the whole "first one is free, then
you're hooked" game.  

I'm not against paying for support and services (I think rhn is the
coolest thing since sliced bread, and worth some money), however, I do
not think that their prices are reasonable, especially when they ask you
to switch from free to paying six digits in the middle of a fiscal year
where you haven't budgeted for it.  So, my desires for Gentoo to fit
better in the enterprise stem from not wanting to stick with a corporate
distro..  Kinda selfish, I know.  :)

> Great!  I think we are closer in our perspectives than it seems.

:)

Cheers,

-Corey

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-07 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-06 23:55 [gentoo-dev] where goes Gentoo? Aron Griffis
2005-06-07  0:36 ` Colin Kingsley
2005-06-07 22:07   ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-06-07  1:02 ` Lance Albertson
2005-06-07 15:08   ` Aron Griffis
2005-06-07 16:23     ` Corey Shields [this message]
2005-06-07 17:56     ` Aron Griffis
2005-06-07 22:38       ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-06-07 22:57         ` Aron Griffis
2005-06-07 22:57         ` Corey Shields
2005-06-07  1:04 ` Dylan Carlson
2005-06-07  2:15   ` Alec Warner
2005-06-07  2:18 ` Corey Shields
2005-06-07  2:45   ` Collins Richey
2005-06-07  3:29     ` Dylan Carlson
2005-06-07  3:36       ` Mike Frysinger
2005-06-07  4:29         ` Dylan Carlson
2005-06-07  4:51 ` Greg KH
2005-06-07  5:19   ` Lance Albertson
2005-06-07  5:01 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2005-06-07  5:24   ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2005-06-07  5:41 ` James Northrup
2005-06-07 12:14 ` Luca Barbato
2005-06-07 15:24 ` Simon Stelling
     [not found] ` <20050607183425.GA29735@xover.htu.tuwien.ac.at>
2005-06-07 19:18   ` Aron Griffis
2005-06-07 19:51     ` Haas Wernfried
2005-06-07 21:13 ` Maurice van der Pot
2005-06-07 22:05 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-06-08  5:14   ` Alin Nastac
2005-06-08 13:40     ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-06-08 21:44 ` Nathan L. Adams
2005-06-09  4:52   ` Aron Griffis
2005-06-11 13:37 ` Chris White
2005-06-12 20:09   ` Athul Acharya
2005-06-12 20:33     ` Zac Medico
2005-06-13 11:18       ` Sami Samhuri
2005-06-16  5:33 ` [gentoo-dev] where goes Gentoo? Where went Fido? Jim Northrup
2005-06-16 16:47   ` Alec Warner
2005-08-03 11:55 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: where goes Gentoo? Sven Köhler
2005-08-03 13:39   ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-08-03 15:36     ` Duncan
2005-08-03 16:10       ` River Yan
2005-08-03 18:43     ` Sven Köhler
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-09 22:32 [gentoo-dev] " Stuart Herbert
2005-06-09 22:53 ` Aron Griffis
2005-06-10  8:28 ` Thierry Carrez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1118161426.7467.13.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=cshields@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox