From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from rockridge.uits.indiana.edu (rockridge.uits.indiana.edu [129.79.1.74])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j572ICF8013255
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 02:18:13 GMT
Received: from mail-relay.iu.edu (stjoseph.uits.indiana.edu [129.79.1.78])
	by rockridge.uits.indiana.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/IUPO) with ESMTP id j572IX4C008430
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 21:18:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.0.3] (71-34-224-60.eugn.qwest.net [71.34.224.60])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by mail-relay.iu.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/IUPO) with ESMTP id j572IWFc024774
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 21:18:33 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] where goes Gentoo?
From: Corey Shields <cshields@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <20050606235550.GL9084@kaf.zko.hp.com>
References: <20050606235550.GL9084@kaf.zko.hp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 19:18:31 -0700
Message-Id: <1118110711.7562.19.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: dd25f716-5aaa-40be-b3c5-b126ecde61cb
X-Archives-Hash: ea460ffcc24d81463017993188d9c5f4

On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 19:55 -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
> In my humble opinion, Gentoo is missing too many points to be an
> enterprise Linux.  We commit to a live tree.  We don't have true QA,
> testing or tinderbox.  We don't have paid staff, alpha/beta/rc cycles.
> We don't really have product lifecycles, since we don't generally
> backport fixes to older versions, requiring instead for people to
> update to a more recent release.  We don't have, and probably will
> never be able to offer, support contracts.  We support as wide a range
> of hardware as the upstream kernel, plus hardware that requires
> external drivers; we don't have access to a great deal of the hardware
> for which we provide drivers.  We understand when real life gets in
> the way of bug-fixing, because all our developers are volunteers.

I don't feel that the list of requirements you have for "enterprise"
linux is necessarily what the enterprise needs..

I think Gentoo has some steps that can be taken to be a better
enterprise player, but to come out and state that it won't work is a bit
bold.  It might not work for HP's description of "enterprise", but that
doesn't mean it wouldn't work for someone else.  I have talked with
people who have used Gentoo in HPC clusters with great success, and I
would consider that an enterprise arena.

> I think that attempting to take Gentoo in the "enterprise" direction
> is a mistake.  I think that we are a hobbyist distribution.  This
> doesn't mean that we should not strive to meet some of the enterprise
> goals.  Those things can be important to hobbyists too.  But I don't
> think we should be aiming for corporate America.

Wow...  as a sysadmin who has run Gentoo in some very high profile
production systems that's a bit offensive to think I used it outside of
a hobbyist platform..  IBM didn't just donate a $30k system for ppc64
development to make it better for someone's basement use, so I don't
think I'm alone in thinking that Gentoo is above "hobbyist".

> I don't even understand why that goal appeals to people.  Let other
> distros go there!  I want Gentoo to run in people's homes, in student
> dorm rooms, etc.  Places where people want a fun distribution that
> they can tailor and work on easily.

Let other distros go there at $1500/year/node (RHEL AS)...

Gentoo is already a fun distribution..  I don't think that has to change
to meet enterprise goals.

> If RH or SuSE (or another for-profit Linux vendor) wants to take some
> of those developments and use them to make a profit, that's fine with
> me.  We're over here having fun.

Personally, I was drawn to Gentoo by the community, which was a lot of
fun.  I still have fun working with the people in this community.  I
don't see why an enterprise goal should be equated with losing the fun
aspect of Gentoo.

Cheers,

-Corey

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list