From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j55IAFpE030601 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 18:10:15 GMT Received: from 12.40.38.74.ruralwirelessinternet.com ([12.40.38.74] helo=pursuit) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DezZm-00042q-Vp for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2005 18:10:23 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: sys-pam category From: Lance Albertson To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200506051350.15778.mcummings@gentoo.org> References: <200506051622.24240@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <1117985871.30949.13.camel@localhost> <200506051350.15778.mcummings@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-jQWZbDcBqCEu1ySe3FAo" Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 13:10:24 -0500 Message-Id: <1117995024.22710.75.camel@pursuit> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 X-Archives-Salt: a85f3ea9-cda1-416f-8544-feac0abfc3cf X-Archives-Hash: d355e31a85ff9a209bf49d4fde381751 --=-jQWZbDcBqCEu1ySe3FAo Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 13:50 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote: > Solar, > I realize you meant this as a general statement of opinion and not a=20 > flame-baiter, but can you elaborate on: >=20 > On Sunday 05 June 2005 11:37, Ned Ludd wrote: > > Invalidates binary package trees.=20 >=20 > My (wrong?) understanding was that this is addressed when portage runs a=20 > fixpackages (otherwise what's it doing to all those binary packages?). I = ask=20 > because its no secret that I'm working on a split up of dev-perl from the= =20 > 500+ packages to a better organized, reasonable scenario where packages a= re=20 > categorized based on, well, category :) rather than on the fact that they= =20 > "contain some perl bits or module bits, stuff them in dev-perl".=20 In my experience, fixpackages doesn't actually fix this sometimes. I've had to phsyically delete the binary package and recreate it for the category to be fixed. Sadly, I haven't had time to search for a bug on it. --=20 Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --=-jQWZbDcBqCEu1ySe3FAo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCo0AQQW+hXSf0t0IRAghhAJ4ph5Ff7XY4tUL4isfitJ/sGGWbRwCdEE00 OJtZ+H8ZRkmJFXHeU+4AUBw= =8cKE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-jQWZbDcBqCEu1ySe3FAo-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list