On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 02:02 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Monday 23 May 2005 18:12, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> > This can't be done everytime, and hoping for, in future, having an
> > universal eject (libcdio should allow that) I wanted to ask if is possible
> > to add a virtual/eject provided by sys-apps/eject and sys-apps/eject-bsd so
> > that they can be made dependencies as needed.

> News about this? We really need a solution to this.

I'm just curious, but why exactly is a virtual needed?

Why can't it be something like:

!blah? ( sys-apps/eject )
blah? (sys-apps/eject-bsd )

A virtual is usually reserved for when it affects a large number of
packages.  If it affects one or two, then simply using some fun *DEPEND
syntax usually covers the issue.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux