From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail.rwisp.com (webmail.rwisp.com [208.191.32.9])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4ONSWMT006285
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 24 May 2005 23:28:33 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.rwisp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25228EA5C8
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 24 May 2005 18:39:20 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail.rwisp.com ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
 id 07049-10 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
 Tue, 24 May 2005 18:39:16 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from 129-kids.homershut.net (linux.homershut.net [64.216.105.3])
	(using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.rwisp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BCBEA58E
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 24 May 2005 18:39:16 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: Pinboard of outdated ports
From: Homer Parker <hparker@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <d703ju$gs4$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <20050523171138.GA22313@neurogen> <42923403.3080007@gentoo.org>
	 <20050523225024.GC5870@neurogen> <429262B1.90109@gentoo.org>
	 <20050524052649.GA5733@neurogen>
	 <1116941770.14290.119.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>
	 <d703ju$gs4$1@sea.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 18:03:30 -0500
Message-Id: <1116975811.18111.0.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at rwisp.com
X-Archives-Salt: 38fb9fc2-563d-44ab-b084-f5f5b0241f65
X-Archives-Hash: 0d3e6b5087286f003d75d1948e284dc7

On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 14:44 -0600, R Hill wrote:
> > What we really need is to have the AT program extended from just
> amd64
> > to every arch, including x86 (which desperately needs an arch team).
> 
> Really?  What does such a team do?

	Glad you asked ;) 

<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/tests/index.xml>

-- 
Homer Parker
Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Tester Operational Lead
hparker@gentoo.org


-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list