From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.rwisp.com (webmail.rwisp.com [208.191.32.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4ONSWMT006285 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 24 May 2005 23:28:33 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rwisp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25228EA5C8 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 24 May 2005 18:39:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.rwisp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07049-10 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 24 May 2005 18:39:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 129-kids.homershut.net (linux.homershut.net [64.216.105.3]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.rwisp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BCBEA58E for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 24 May 2005 18:39:16 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Pinboard of outdated ports From: Homer Parker <hparker@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <d703ju$gs4$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <20050523171138.GA22313@neurogen> <42923403.3080007@gentoo.org> <20050523225024.GC5870@neurogen> <429262B1.90109@gentoo.org> <20050524052649.GA5733@neurogen> <1116941770.14290.119.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <d703ju$gs4$1@sea.gmane.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 18:03:30 -0500 Message-Id: <1116975811.18111.0.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at rwisp.com X-Archives-Salt: 38fb9fc2-563d-44ab-b084-f5f5b0241f65 X-Archives-Hash: 0d3e6b5087286f003d75d1948e284dc7 On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 14:44 -0600, R Hill wrote: > > What we really need is to have the AT program extended from just > amd64 > > to every arch, including x86 (which desperately needs an arch team). > > Really? What does such a team do? Glad you asked ;) <http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/tests/index.xml> -- Homer Parker Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Tester Operational Lead hparker@gentoo.org -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list