From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4KLwAnO011332 for ; Fri, 20 May 2005 21:58:10 GMT Received: from tomaw.plus.com [80.229.223.243] (helo=tom.tomaw.org) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML2Dk-1DZFPt2CeC-00043Y; Fri, 20 May 2005 23:52:25 +0200 Received: by tom.tomaw.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BDABE110936; Fri, 20 May 2005 22:49:51 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Keywording, for the umpteenth time From: Tom Wesley To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20050520222238.157d8270@snowdrop> References: <1116615190.8364.203.camel@localhost> <428E4DE7.70905@gentoo.org> <20050520222238.157d8270@snowdrop> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vJxt4IXzH/5qJCoyXKD2" Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 22:49:50 +0100 Message-Id: <1116625790.9174.5.camel@tom.tomaw.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:e0c4ec921101b4afa5f9efb3db39afe3 X-Archives-Salt: dbe346a6-579c-422f-8b09-fc0f9315b2e2 X-Archives-Hash: 970f0f3d55c96f53cbbd5707fc958b64 --=-vJxt4IXzH/5qJCoyXKD2 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 22:22 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Not gonna happen. Emulators don't cut it and won't find all the problems > (but they will find a load of other bogus non-issues). Plus, from > experience I'd say that at least half our devs wouldn't have a clue > where to start when doing arch testing... Add this HOWTO arch test to your developer docs. Very nice by the way. > Then there's the issue of most alt-archs having far higher QA standards > than x86 anyway, and us not wanting to sink to what x86 considers > acceptable for marking stable. >=20 > From experience -- the current policy as it is now *works*, so long as > everyone follows it. And as long as ciaranm, or someone from a non x86 arch bitches once a month here. --=20 Tom Wesley --=-vJxt4IXzH/5qJCoyXKD2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCjlt+VYNIRGKYOlIRAuQHAKCZGFck0bxA2xqZpbAIDlUhdHHsvQCgqRYs k8+dC5zihYn2Ao6RdtZaCs0= =n+jz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vJxt4IXzH/5qJCoyXKD2-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list