From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.e7even.com (smtp.e7even.com [83.151.192.5]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j4KIsH0O001356 for ; Fri, 20 May 2005 18:54:17 GMT Received: (qmail 21926 invoked from network); 20 May 2005 18:54:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 May 2005 18:54:21 -0000 Received: from smtp.e7even.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gateway [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 20821-10 for ; Fri, 20 May 2005 19:54:19 +0100 (BST) Received: (qmail 20036 invoked from network); 20 May 2005 18:51:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO user-203-207-151-83.e7even.com) (83.151.207.203) by smtp.e7even.com with SMTP; 20 May 2005 18:51:27 -0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Keywording, for the umpteenth time From: Duncan Coutts To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 19:53:09 +0100 Message-Id: <1116615190.8364.203.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at e7even.com X-Archives-Salt: 4f26b53c-2592-4989-a45f-571728498185 X-Archives-Hash: cb569be853fb21423f50235ca4964571 On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 10:42 -0600, Jason Wever wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > OK, let's review this again. > > If you cannot test a given ebuild on a given arch, then don't touch that > arch's keyword (unless you need to remove it for broken dependencies). > > If you can test for a given arch and are not part of that arch team, > please please please let the arch teams know that before you go around > keywording things arbitrarily. It makes the baby Jesus cry when you don't > and really isn't the greatest from a QA perspective either. Sorry folks this was my fault. I've sent my grovelling apology to the sparc team. Hopefully they'll accept my apologies and put my digressions down to me being a new dev. :-) Actually I did do fairly thorough testing / QA but I didn't tell the arch team before keywording (bad me!). In case anyone is interested; this is about the Haskell packages which I hope to get up to scratch on sparc (with the consent and approval of the sparc team in future!) Duncan -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list