From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4HEUEcb015092
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 17 May 2005 14:30:15 GMT
Received: from [10.0.0.100] (really [69.172.100.254]) by mta11.adelphia.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with ESMTP
          id <20050517143020.OPXM13270.mta11.adelphia.net@[10.0.0.100]>
          for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
          Tue, 17 May 2005 10:30:20 -0400
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org
From: Jeffrey Forman <jforman@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <4289FA2E.2050105@gentoo.org>
References: <1116289036.8159.46.camel@buckhead.formanonline.com>
	 <4289E7B3.3090006@myrealbox.com> <4289EBD4.3010000@gentoo.org>
	 <20050517134343.GA8469@lion.gg3.net> <4289F7B0.5090703@myrealbox.com>
	 <4289FA2E.2050105@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 10:30:19 -0400
Message-Id: <1116340220.8403.2.camel@buckhead.formanonline.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 53e2cc1b-1e1a-453e-9f34-31668e1494dd
X-Archives-Hash: 97b0173cd98f9ae28b4e26cb96a9f134

I've looked at the actual DB behind bugzilla, and that seems to be the
only bug having that such situation, with a resolved-like status, but no
resolution, all the other bugs look fine. *shrug*

-Jeffrey

On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 17:05 +0300, Alin Dobre wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> Jonathan Smith wrote:
> > Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> > 
> >>>maillog: 17/05/2005-16:04:20(+0300): Alin Dobre types
> >>>
> >>>>>*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 12745 ***
> >>>>
> >>>>Here it is, the last row.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>But in the headers it says:
> >>>
> >>>Status:     RESOLVED
> >>>Resolution:
> >>>
> > 
> > 
> > right. what i was saying was that it is very nice to see the reason for
> > resolution in the summary section.
> 
> something like this:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
>          Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE
> 
> yes, indeed, the Resolution is empty, now.

> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list