From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from ppsw-7.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-7.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.137])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4AFUTaw007352
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 10 May 2005 15:30:29 GMT
X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned
X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from spb42.christs.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.233.172]:27526)
	by ppsw-7.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:465)
	with esmtpsa (PLAIN:spb42) (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128)
	id 1DVWgm-0000i5-Oq (Exim 4.51) for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
	(return-path <spb@gentoo.org>); Tue, 10 May 2005 16:30:28 +0100
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: Re: New category proposal
From: Stephen Bennett <spb@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <4280CDBC.5020002@egr.msu.edu>
References: <427E116E.9080105@gentoo.org> <d5ljh7$sc7$1@sea.gmane.org>
	 <1115591359.19595.124.camel@bunyip>
	 <e00942e4050508160148963e03@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20050508235004.GL6541@celeborn.wh-og.hs-niederrhein.de>
	 <20050509001920.GC12085@ols-dell.gg3.net>
	 <20050509170725.GC21777@kaf.zko.hp.com>
	 <1115715727.25756.8.camel@nosferatu.lan>
	 <pan.2005.05.10.14.27.28.357851@cox.net>  <4280CDBC.5020002@egr.msu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 16:36:57 +0100
Message-Id: <1115739418.24940.5.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: spb42@hermes.cam.ac.uk
X-Archives-Salt: c10d6102-e654-403e-8c07-d71fcdb93182
X-Archives-Hash: de8675f8042e5e5cda17fc10de10fc45

On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 11:05 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> I'll be the first alt-arch person to scream, Reiser isn't stable on more
> than half the arch's we support, and forcing users to go to one
> filesystem just to get decent speed on portage tree searches is silly.

Besides which, as of latested released kernels Reiser still doesn't have
working extended attributes, so SELinux systems can't mount it.
Apparently there's a patch kicking around, but forcing people to patch
kernels themselves is even sillier.

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list