From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j47NcvAq001153; Sat, 7 May 2005 23:38:58 GMT Received: from 12.40.38.131.ruralwirelessinternet.com ([12.40.38.131] helo=pursuit) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DUYsr-0006Xd-Qn; Sat, 07 May 2005 23:38:57 +0000 Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Trustee ML Archives From: Lance Albertson To: Donnie Berkholz Cc: gentoo-core , gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-dev In-Reply-To: <427D4710.6090109@gentoo.org> References: <1115499816.32207.3.camel@pursuit> <427D4710.6090109@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-hr8y20ea7Z3fcZyYbH4G" Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 18:38:55 -0500 Message-Id: <1115509135.32207.17.camel@pursuit> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 X-Archives-Salt: 631cec42-605a-4789-ac5c-099a65f06c20 X-Archives-Hash: 2210ec8d5e0964011477170774fe12dd --=-hr8y20ea7Z3fcZyYbH4G Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 15:54 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > Lance Albertson wrote: > > Just thought I'd mention that the archives [1] are back up for the > > trustee mailing list. Its still being worked on, but most of the talk > > from the last year should be up. > >=20 > > Please thank Grant for sifting through the archive to clean out anythin= g > > our lawyers wanted out (specific names to themselves, etc). Also thank > > blackace for getting it back up! > >=20 > > [1] http://archives.gentoo.org/ml/gentoo-trustees/ >=20 > This is great news! >=20 > Just one question: Am I understanding correctly that there were actually > zero posts to the list in April [1]? I get a blank page when I click the > link, which isn't really intuitive whether it's a bug or no posts. Just fixed it. Was a minor xml buglet that I sorted out. Cheers, --=20 Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --=-hr8y20ea7Z3fcZyYbH4G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCfVGPQW+hXSf0t0IRAqJzAJsGNx6bULV0TnMB76OrFsDR7+CT+wCguCjC HSWjDJbUVFfE963rUQBkcko= =0qMR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-hr8y20ea7Z3fcZyYbH4G-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list