public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lance Albertson <ramereth@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone use wolk-sources?
Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 10:44:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1114962284.21624.1.camel@pursuit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4274B7D5.4010206@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2032 bytes --]

On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 12:04 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Lance Albertson wrote:
> > I was actually just thinking about WOLK today and how I never got around
> > to putting the newest builds in the tree. For now keep them in there.
> > I'll email upstream to see if whats the status on development for WOLK
> > these days. The mailing lists have been quiet for the most part, so
> > we'll see. It may be based on 2.4.20 but its no where near to what
> > 2.4.20 is ;). Its closer to a 2.6 kernel by now with its latest
> > versions.
> 
> 2.4.20 came out in 2002. You'd have thought they might base it off something
> newer by now...

I'm not sure why he did it that way. I know he essentially patched in
the later versions (crazy I know).

> > Infra currently decommissioned to the two boxes we were running WOLK on,
> > so we don't currently have a need for it from that side of things.
> > 
> > I'll report back when I find out whats going on!
> 
> Ok. The main issue is that keeping old kernels around is a maintenance
> nightmare with the security patches, etc. Also, this kernel is so heavily
> patched that it would be impossible for us to support it. On top of that,
> there doesn't seem to be any demand for it - we have only ever had a few bug
> reports for it, and we've never recieved a bump request for the latest version
> which is months behind the last official release.
> 
> I'll at least be cleaning out the two older versions (4.9-r21 and 4.11-r17)
> over the next few days.

Yeah, I agree sadly. Since I haven't seen much activity on their devel
lists I'd have to say things have pretty much stopped. Give me a few
days to see if we get a response from the upstream author as to the
status of the project before we totally axe it.

-- 
Lance Albertson <ramereth@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager

---
GPG Public Key:  <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1  4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742

ramereth/irc.freenode.net

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2005-05-01 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-30 23:47 [gentoo-dev] Anyone use wolk-sources? Daniel Drake
2005-05-01  1:04 ` Lance Albertson
2005-05-01 11:04   ` Daniel Drake
2005-05-01 15:44     ` Lance Albertson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1114962284.21624.1.camel@pursuit \
    --to=ramereth@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox