From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4114DEf005821 for ; Sun, 1 May 2005 01:04:13 GMT Received: from [12.40.38.131] (helo=pursuit) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1DS2sY-0007e0-Bm for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 01 May 2005 01:04:14 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone use wolk-sources? From: Lance Albertson To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <42741920.5010605@gentoo.org> References: <42741920.5010605@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-6gt8rxZ75uKmFlk26145" Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 20:04:14 -0500 Message-Id: <1114909454.2268.3.camel@pursuit> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 X-Archives-Salt: 7327150b-f87a-4b88-8517-3f1407e0427c X-Archives-Hash: 2bc337c5bc9a368c1042b017ef8b19d6 --=-6gt8rxZ75uKmFlk26145 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 00:47 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I'm considering masking wolk-sources and removing it from the tree. Do an= y > people still have a good reason to use wolk-sources? >=20 > wolk-sources is a heavily patched Linux 2.4 kernel which lacks upstream > maintenance - the newest version being based on Linux 2.4.20. >=20 > Any objections? I was actually just thinking about WOLK today and how I never got around to putting the newest builds in the tree. For now keep them in there. I'll email upstream to see if whats the status on development for WOLK these days. The mailing lists have been quiet for the most part, so we'll see. It may be based on 2.4.20 but its no where near to what 2.4.20 is ;). Its closer to a 2.6 kernel by now with its latest versions. Infra currently decommissioned to the two boxes we were running WOLK on, so we don't currently have a need for it from that side of things. I'll report back when I find out whats going on! --=20 Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --=-6gt8rxZ75uKmFlk26145 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCdCsOQW+hXSf0t0IRAnPAAKCz2Ax9wJmo5aaClLvAjPUSiNPLMACfU1n0 JRW48dfQdcyLXbhXGYMq/0c= =A5Of -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-6gt8rxZ75uKmFlk26145-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list